A Comparative Study on the Works of Ibn Khaldun and Yusuf Has Hacib

Oğuz Demir

Makale detayları

A Comparative Study on the Works of Ibn Khaldun and Yusuf Has Hacib

Yazarlar:

Oğuz Demir

Yayıncı:

Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar:

Kamu Yönetimi

Dergi:

Journal of Political Administrative and Local Studies Vol.7 Issue 2, pp.93-103

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001338704

pISSN:

2636-803X

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 In this study, Ibn Khalduns Muqaddime and Yusuf Has Hacibs Kutadgu Bilig are compared and the similarities and differences of the views developed by both thinkers on state and social order are analysed. The aim of the study is to identify the common principles regarding the role of the ruler, the concept of justice, and issues such as the collapse of the state and corruption in the light of the ideas put forward by both thinkers in different historical and cultural contexts, and to reveal the contributions that these principles can offer to contemporary political philosophy. Yusuf Has Hacibs Kutadgu Bilig presents an ideal model of governance based on justice and wisdom for rulers and emphasises the duty of ensuring the welfare of the people and the sustainability of the state. The work conveys the virtues of governance through four main characters with concepts such as justice, happiness, wisdom and the end of life. Ibn Khaldun, on the other hand, analyses the development of societies and the rise and fall cycle of states within the framework of the concept of asabiyyah. In the work, it is argued that states gain strength in periods when solidarity is strong, while weakening asabiyyah leads to the dissolution and collapse of the state. As a result, it has been determined that both thinkers, despite living in different periods and cultural conditions, advocate similar values for the sustainability of the state and the peace of society. Kutadgu Bilig and Muqaddime offer complementary perspectives on issues such as state administration, social solidarity and corruption.

 In this study, Ibn Khalduns Muqaddime and Yusuf Has Hacibs Kutadgu Bilig are compared and the similarities and differences of the views developed by both thinkers on state and social order are analysed. The aim of the study is to identify the common principles regarding the role of the ruler, the concept of justice, and issues such as the collapse of the state and corruption in the light of the ideas put forward by both thinkers in different historical and cultural contexts, and to reveal the contributions that these principles can offer to contemporary political philosophy. Yusuf Has Hacibs Kutadgu Bilig presents an ideal model of governance based on justice and wisdom for rulers and emphasises the duty of ensuring the welfare of the people and the sustainability of the state. The work conveys the virtues of governance through four main characters with concepts such as justice, happiness, wisdom and the end of life. Ibn Khaldun, on the other hand, analyses the development of societies and the rise and fall cycle of states within the framework of the concept of asabiyyah. In the work, it is argued that states gain strength in periods when solidarity is strong, while weakening asabiyyah leads to the dissolution and collapse of the state. As a result, it has been determined that both thinkers, despite living in different periods and cultural conditions, advocate similar values for the sustainability of the state and the peace of society. Kutadgu Bilig and Muqaddime offer complementary perspectives on issues such as state administration, social solidarity and corruption.

 In this study, Ibn Khalduns Muqaddime and Yusuf Has Hacibs Kutadgu Bilig are compared and the similarities and differences of the views developed by both thinkers on state and social order are analysed. The aim of the study is to identify the common principles regarding the role of the ruler, the concept of justice, and issues such as the collapse of the state and corruption in the light of the ideas put forward by both thinkers in different historical and cultural contexts, and to reveal the contributions that these principles can offer to contemporary political philosophy. Yusuf Has Hacibs Kutadgu Bilig presents an ideal model of governance based on justice and wisdom for rulers and emphasises the duty of ensuring the welfare of the people and the sustainability of the state. The work conveys the virtues of governance through four main characters with concepts such as justice, happiness, wisdom and the end of life. Ibn Khaldun, on the other hand, analyses the development of societies and the rise and fall cycle of states within the framework of the concept of asabiyyah. In the work, it is argued that states gain strength in periods when solidarity is strong, while weakening asabiyyah leads to the dissolution and collapse of the state. As a result, it has been determined that both thinkers, despite living in different periods and cultural conditions, advocate similar values for the sustainability of the state and the peace of society. Kutadgu Bilig and Muqaddime offer complementary perspectives on issues such as state administration, social solidarity and corruption.

 Bu çalışmada, İbn Haldunun Mukaddime adlı eseri ile Yusuf Has Hacibin Kutadgu Biligi karşılaştırılarak, her iki düşünürün devlet ve toplum düzenine dair geliştirdiği görüşlerin benzerlikleri ve farklılıkları incelenmiştir. Çalışmanın amacı, her iki düşünürün farklı tarihsel ve kültürel bağlamlarda ortaya koydukları düşünceler ışığında, yöneticinin rolü, adalet kavramı ve devletin yıkılışı ve yozlaşma gibi konulara dair ortak ilkeleri tespit etmek ve bu ilkelerin çağdaş siyaset felsefesine sunabileceği katkıları ortaya koymaktır. Yusuf Has Hacibin Kutadgu Bilig adlı eseri, yöneticilere adalet ve bilgelik temelli ideal bir yönetim modeli sunmakta, halkın refahını ve devletin sürdürülebilirliğini sağlama görevini vurgulamaktadır. Eser, dört ana karakter aracılığıyla adalet, mutluluk, bilgelik ve yaşamın sonu gibi kavramlarla yönetim erdemlerini aktarmaktadır. İbn Haldun ise Mukaddimede toplumların gelişimini ve devletlerin yükseliş-çöküş döngüsünü asabiyet kavramı çerçevesinde analiz etmektedir. Eserde, dayanışmanın güçlü olduğu dönemlerde devletlerin güç kazandığı, zayıflayan asabiyetin ise devletin çözülmesine ve yıkılışına yol açtığı ileri sürülmektedir Sonuç olarak, her iki düşünürün, farklı dönem ve kültürel koşullarda yaşamalarına rağmen, devletin sürdürülebilirliği ve toplumun huzuru için benzer değerleri savundukları tespit edilmiştir. Kutadgu Bilig ve Mukaddime, devlet yönetimi, toplumsal dayanışma ve yozlaşma gibi konularda birbirini tamamlayıcı perspektifler sunmaktadır.

Makale detayları

A Comparative Study on the Works of Ibn Khaldun and Yusuf Has Hacib

Yazarlar:

Oğuz Demir

Yayıncı:

Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar:

Kamu Yönetimi

Dergi:

Journal of Political Administrative and Local Studies Vol.7 Issue 2, pp.93-103

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001338704

pISSN:

2636-803X

State Governance

Asabiyyah

Justice and WisdomDevlet Yönetimi

Asabiyet

Adalet ve Bilgelik

Sayı

Makale detayları

A Comparative Study on the Works of Ibn Khaldun and Yusuf Has Hacib

Yazarlar: Oğuz Demir

Yayıncı: Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar: Kamu Yönetimi

Dergi: Journal of Political Administrative and Local Studies Vol.7 Issue 2, pp.93-103

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 12/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001338704

pISSN: 2636-803X

State Governance

Asabiyyah

Justice and WisdomDevlet Yönetimi

Asabiyet

Adalet ve Bilgelik

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Oğuz Demir

Yayıncı:

Sakarya University

Ana Başlıklar:

Kamu Yönetimi

Dergi:

Journal of Political Administrative and Local Studies Vol.7 Issue 2, pp.93-103

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001338704

pISSN:

2636-803X