Art! In What Sense?

Burçak İSMET ÖZSOY

doi:https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.334861

Makale detayları

Art! In What Sense?

Yazarlar:

Burçak İSMET ÖZSOY

Yayıncı:

Ahmet Arif EREN

Ana Başlıklar:

Yönetim

Dergi:

Fiscaoeconomia 2017 Vol.1 Issue 3, pp.156-163

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

9/2017

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2000710889

Sıklık:

Üç Yıllık

eISSN:

2564-7504

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.334861

Özet:

 


This paper is a critique of the conception of
art which is mainly based on Arthur Danto’s definition of art via Hegelian aesthetics.
In 1964, when Danto encountered with Andy Warhol’s Brillo Box a renewed era
for the definition of art has come. For Hegel one of the most crucial criteria for
art-work is its indispensible adequacy between content and presentation. Although
Danto as a philosopher is so much Hegelian by the time of modern art there
emerges a historical shift within art and this article tries to reveal how Danto
departs from Hegel through the philosophical question of what makes any work an
art-work. When there renders no ‘bodily’ distinction between content and
presentation, there emerges an essential question: According to what one of the Brillo boxes inside a grocery
store is just an ordinary box while the other one is such a precious artwork in
Soho Gallery.

.

Makale detayları

Art! In What Sense?

Yazarlar: Burçak İSMET ÖZSOY

Yayıncı: Ahmet Arif EREN

Ana Başlıklar: Yönetim

Dergi: Fiscaoeconomia 2017 Vol.1 Issue 3, pp.156-163

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 9/2017

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2000710889

Sıklık: Üç Yıllık

eISSN: 2564-7504

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.334861

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Burçak İSMET ÖZSOY

Yayıncı:

Ahmet Arif EREN

Ana Başlıklar:

Yönetim

Dergi:

Fiscaoeconomia 2017 Vol.1 Issue 3, pp.156-163

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

9/2017

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2000710889

Sıklık:

Üç Yıllık

eISSN:

2564-7504

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.334861