GLOBALIZATION AND INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION IN CONCESSION CONTRACTS

Kadir Can Özel

Makale detayları

GLOBALIZATION AND INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION IN CONCESSION CONTRACTS

Yazarlar:

Kadir Can Özel

Yayıncı:

Dicle University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Dicle Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Issue 36, pp.45-75

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001321696

pISSN:

1308-6219

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 The Constitutional amendment of August 13, 1999 has led to significant changes in the administrative law of our country. The amendments made to article 47, article 125 and article 155 of the Constitution can be given as examples. With the amendment made in article 47, the legislator has been given the authority to determine the nature of contracts signed by the administration. With the amendment made in article 125, the way for national and international arbitration for disputes arising from concession conditions and contracts related to public services has been opened in the constitutional framework. With the amendment made in article 155, the duty of examination of the Council of State on concession conditions and contracts has been transformed into the duty of expressing opinion and its control over concession contracts has been reduced. Thus, the narrowing of the application area of Turkish administrative jurisdiction and Turkish administrative law in the context of concession contracts comes to the fore. In addition, when the jurisdiction arising from the sovereignty of the state is left to international arbitration, damage may occur in the concepts of sovereignty, public order and public interest. For the reasons mentioned, in our study, international arbitration in concession contracts has been addressed as a dispute resolution method that contributes to the promotion of foreign investments but allows global capital to carry out its activities and investments -mostly through transnational companies- on a legal basis in the context of globalization.

 The Constitutional amendment of August 13, 1999 has led to significant changes in the administrative law of our country. The amendments made to article 47, article 125 and article 155 of the Constitution can be given as examples. With the amendment made in article 47, the legislator has been given the authority to determine the nature of contracts signed by the administration. With the amendment made in article 125, the way for national and international arbitration for disputes arising from concession conditions and contracts related to public services has been opened in the constitutional framework. With the amendment made in article 155, the duty of examination of the Council of State on concession conditions and contracts has been transformed into the duty of expressing opinion and its control over concession contracts has been reduced. Thus, the narrowing of the application area of Turkish administrative jurisdiction and Turkish administrative law in the context of concession contracts comes to the fore. In addition, when the jurisdiction arising from the sovereignty of the state is left to international arbitration, damage may occur in the concepts of sovereignty, public order and public interest. For the reasons mentioned, in our study, international arbitration in concession contracts has been addressed as a dispute resolution method that contributes to the promotion of foreign investments but allows global capital to carry out its activities and investments -mostly through transnational companies- on a legal basis in the context of globalization.

 The Constitutional amendment of August 13, 1999 has led to significant changes in the administrative law of our country. The amendments made to article 47, article 125 and article 155 of the Constitution can be given as examples. With the amendment made in article 47, the legislator has been given the authority to determine the nature of contracts signed by the administration. With the amendment made in article 125, the way for national and international arbitration for disputes arising from concession conditions and contracts related to public services has been opened in the constitutional framework. With the amendment made in article 155, the duty of examination of the Council of State on concession conditions and contracts has been transformed into the duty of expressing opinion and its control over concession contracts has been reduced. Thus, the narrowing of the application area of Turkish administrative jurisdiction and Turkish administrative law in the context of concession contracts comes to the fore. In addition, when the jurisdiction arising from the sovereignty of the state is left to international arbitration, damage may occur in the concepts of sovereignty, public order and public interest. For the reasons mentioned, in our study, international arbitration in concession contracts has been addressed as a dispute resolution method that contributes to the promotion of foreign investments but allows global capital to carry out its activities and investments -mostly through transnational companies- on a legal basis in the context of globalization.

 13 Ağustos 1999 tarihli Anayasa değişikliği ülkemiz idare hukukunda önemli değişikliklere neden olmuştur. Anayasanın 47. maddesinde, 125. maddesinde ve 155. maddesinde yapılan değişiklikler buna örnek gösterilebilir. 47. maddede yapılan değişiklikle, kanun koyucuya idarenin imzaladığı sözleşmelerin niteliğini belirleme yetkisi tanınmıştır. 125. maddede yapılan değişiklikle, kamu hizmetleriyle ilgili imtiyaz şartlaşma ve sözleşmelerinden doğacak uyuşmazlıklar için ulusal ve uluslararası tahkimin önü anayasal kurguda açılmıştır. 155. maddede yapılan değişiklikle, Danıştayın imtiyaz şartlaşma ve sözleşmeleri hakkında yaptığı inceleme görevi düşünce bildirme görevine dönüştürülmüş ve imtiyaz sözleşmeleri üzerindeki denetimi azaltılmıştır. Böylelikle imtiyaz sözleşmeleri bağlamında Türk idari yargısının ve Türk idare hukukunun uygulama alanının daralması gündeme gelmektedir. Ayrıca devletin egemenliğinden kaynaklanan yargılama yetkisinin uluslararası tahkim yargılamasına terk edilmesiyle egemenlik, kamu düzeni, kamu yararı kavramlarında zedelenmeler ortaya çıkabilecektir. Sayılan sebeplerle çalışmamızda imtiyaz sözleşmelerinde uluslararası tahkim, küreselleşme bağlamında yabancı yatırımların teşvikine katkı sunan ancak küresel sermayenin faaliyetlerini ve yatırımlarını -çoğunlukla ulusötesi şirketler aracılığıyla- dilediği gibi bir hukuksal zeminde yapmasına olanak tanıyan bir uyuşmazlık çözüm yöntemi olarak ele alınmıştır.

Makale detayları

GLOBALIZATION AND INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION IN CONCESSION CONTRACTS

Yazarlar:

Kadir Can Özel

Yayıncı:

Dicle University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Dicle Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Issue 36, pp.45-75

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001321696

pISSN:

1308-6219

Capital

Globalization of Capital

Concession Contracts

International Arbitration

SovereigntySermaye

Sermayenin Küreselleşmesi

İmtiyaz Sözleşmeleri

Uluslararası Tahkim

Egemenlik

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Kadir Can Özel

Yayıncı: Dicle University

Ana Başlıklar: Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi: Dicle Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Issue 36, pp.45-75

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 4/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001321696

pISSN: 1308-6219

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Kadir Can Özel

Yayıncı:

Dicle University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Dicle Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Issue 36, pp.45-75

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001321696

pISSN:

1308-6219