VARIABILITY OF THE DIAMETER OF SIZE #25, 0.06  GUTTA-PERCHA CONES

N.A.

Makale detayları

VARIABILITY OF THE DIAMETER OF SIZE #25, 0.06 GUTTA-PERCHA CONES

Yazarlar:

N.A.

Yayıncı:

Dicle University

Ana Başlıklar:

Dentistry

Dergi:

Dicle Dental Journal Vol.24 Issue 1, pp.1-4

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001290269

pISSN:

2822-6755

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Aim: Manufacturers produce gutta-percha cones that match different endodontic file sizes to seal the canal and reduce uptime. The aim of this study is to compare the diameters of 3 different gutta-percha brands produced in the same dimensions. Material and Method: D1, D3, and D16 diameters of 0.25 mm, apical diameter of 0.06 mm tapered gutta-percha cones of Pearl Endo, Diadent, and Pearl Endopia brands were measured using millimetric paper and electronic calipers n60. Statistical evaluations were made according to the gold standard and between brands. Results: While the diameter width measurement for D1, D3, and D16 levels is significantly higher than the standard gold value in the Pearl Endopia brand compared to the other two gutta-percha brands p0.05, it is significantly less in the Pearl Endo and Diadent brands p0.05. In the comparison between groups, there was no difference for Pearl Endo and Diadent brands at D1 and D3 levels p0.05, while Pearl Endopia diameters were significantly higher than the other two groups p0.05. Conclusion: It was found that the diameters of GP cones manufactured by different brands may differ at the same level.

 Aim: Manufacturers produce gutta-percha cones that match different endodontic file sizes to seal the canal and reduce uptime. The aim of this study is to compare the diameters of 3 different gutta-percha brands produced in the same dimensions. Material and Method: D1, D3, and D16 diameters of 0.25 mm, apical diameter of 0.06 mm tapered gutta-percha cones of Pearl Endo, Diadent, and Pearl Endopia brands were measured using millimetric paper and electronic calipers n60. Statistical evaluations were made according to the gold standard and between brands. Results: While the diameter width measurement for D1, D3, and D16 levels is significantly higher than the standard gold value in the Pearl Endopia brand compared to the other two gutta-percha brands p0.05, it is significantly less in the Pearl Endo and Diadent brands p0.05. In the comparison between groups, there was no difference for Pearl Endo and Diadent brands at D1 and D3 levels p0.05, while Pearl Endopia diameters were significantly higher than the other two groups p0.05. Conclusion: It was found that the diameters of GP cones manufactured by different brands may differ at the same level.

 Aim: Manufacturers produce gutta-percha cones that match different endodontic file sizes to seal the canal and reduce uptime. The aim of this study is to compare the diameters of 3 different gutta-percha brands produced in the same dimensions. Material and Method: D1, D3, and D16 diameters of 0.25 mm, apical diameter of 0.06 mm tapered gutta-percha cones of Pearl Endo, Diadent, and Pearl Endopia brands were measured using millimetric paper and electronic calipers n60. Statistical evaluations were made according to the gold standard and between brands. Results: While the diameter width measurement for D1, D3, and D16 levels is significantly higher than the standard gold value in the Pearl Endopia brand compared to the other two gutta-percha brands p0.05, it is significantly less in the Pearl Endo and Diadent brands p0.05. In the comparison between groups, there was no difference for Pearl Endo and Diadent brands at D1 and D3 levels p0.05, while Pearl Endopia diameters were significantly higher than the other two groups p0.05. Conclusion: It was found that the diameters of GP cones manufactured by different brands may differ at the same level.

 Amaç: Üreticiler kanalda sızdırmazlık sağlamak ve çalışma süresini kısaltmak amacıyla farklı boyutlarda endodontik eğelerle eşleşen güta perka konileri üretmektedirler. Bu çalışmanın amacı aynı boyutlarda üretilmiş 3 farklı güta perka markasının çaplarının karşılaştırılmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Pearl Endo, Diadent, Pearl Endopia markalarına ait 0,25 mm apikal çaplı 0,06 mm taperli güta perka konların D1,D3 ve D16 çapları milimetrik kağıt ve elektronik kaliper yardımıyla kullanılarak ölçüldü n60. İstatistiksel değerlendirmeler altın standarta göre ve markalar arasında yapıldı. Bulgular: D1, D3 ve D16 seviyeleri için yapılan çap genişliği ölçümü Pearl Endopia markasında diğer iki güta perka markasına göre altın standart değerden anlamlı derecede daha fazla iken p0,05, Pearl Endo ve Diadent markalarında anlamlı derecede daha azdır p0,05. Gruplar arası karşılaştırmada D1 ve D3 seviyelerinde Pearl Endo ve Diadent markaları için fark bulunmazken p0,05, Pearl Endopia çapları diğer iki gruba göre anlamlı derecede daha fazlaydı p0,05. Sonuç: Farklı markalar tarafından üretilen GP konların aynı seviyedeki çaplarının farklı olabileceği bulundu.

Makale detayları

VARIABILITY OF THE DIAMETER OF SIZE #25, 0.06 GUTTA-PERCHA CONES

Yazarlar:

N.A.

Yayıncı:

Dicle University

Ana Başlıklar:

Dentistry

Dergi:

Dicle Dental Journal Vol.24 Issue 1, pp.1-4

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001290269

pISSN:

2822-6755

Gutta-percha

variability

diameter measurementGüta-perka

değişkenlik

çap ölçümü

Sayı

Makale detayları

VARIABILITY OF THE DIAMETER OF SIZE #25, 0.06 GUTTA-PERCHA CONES

Yazarlar: N.A.

Yayıncı: Dicle University

Ana Başlıklar: Dentistry

Dergi: Dicle Dental Journal Vol.24 Issue 1, pp.1-4

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 6/2023

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001290269

pISSN: 2822-6755

Gutta-percha

variability

diameter measurementGüta-perka

değişkenlik

çap ölçümü

Sayı

Yazarlar:

N.A.

Yayıncı:

Dicle University

Ana Başlıklar:

Dentistry

Dergi:

Dicle Dental Journal Vol.24 Issue 1, pp.1-4

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001290269

pISSN:

2822-6755