An Evaluation on the Typologies of Homo Islamicus and Homo Economicus in the Context of the Inter-Civilizational Relationship

Sait Ebinç

Makale detayları

An Evaluation on the Typologies of Homo Islamicus and Homo Economicus in the Context of the Inter-Civilizational Relationship

Yazarlar:

Sait Ebinç

Yayıncı:

Van Yuzuncu Yıl University

Ana Başlıklar:

Kamu Yönetimi

Dergi:

Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Issue 62, pp.154-161

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001309259

pISSN:

1302-6879

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 The aim of this article is to analyze the intellectual, mental, and ideological tensions between Islamic Civilization and Western Civilization, which are among the foremost economic, political, and diplomatic issues in the contemporary world. This analysis intends to explore these relations not only from the perspective of tension but also in terms of dialogue and tolerance. The method to be employed in this analysis aims to compare the tensioned relations between the two civilizations, both historically and methodologically, through a comparative approach, focusing on thought, mentality, and human context, with two different ideal types, Homo Economicus and Homo Islamicus. This analysis seeks to answer the following questions: Is the relationship between civilizations a tension that exists independently of man or arises from ideological political institutions above him? Has man and his rights been able to reach a competence to transcend political and ideological boundaries and establish a ground for dialogue and reconciliation? Are the projects developed concerning these dialogue and tolerance grounds of hegemonic design? Do definitions like identity and personality, shaped by societal and cultural accumulations, stem from hegemonic relationships? Why cant an independent, non-original, or non-integrist tradition of thought emerge in contemporary Islamic societies? Another fundamental assumption of this article is that in contemporary Islamic world, it is not only thought but also political thought and practices that dominate the thought domain and the religious field. It assumes that political thought in Islamic societies, whether in its modern or traditional form, redefines its unique civilizational imagination through human-God, human-universe, human-human, and human-society relationships.

 The aim of this article is to analyze the intellectual, mental, and ideological tensions between Islamic Civilization and Western Civilization, which are among the foremost economic, political, and diplomatic issues in the contemporary world. This analysis intends to explore these relations not only from the perspective of tension but also in terms of dialogue and tolerance. The method to be employed in this analysis aims to compare the tensioned relations between the two civilizations, both historically and methodologically, through a comparative approach, focusing on thought, mentality, and human context, with two different ideal types, Homo Economicus and Homo Islamicus. This analysis seeks to answer the following questions: Is the relationship between civilizations a tension that exists independently of man or arises from ideological political institutions above him? Has man and his rights been able to reach a competence to transcend political and ideological boundaries and establish a ground for dialogue and reconciliation? Are the projects developed concerning these dialogue and tolerance grounds of hegemonic design? Do definitions like identity and personality, shaped by societal and cultural accumulations, stem from hegemonic relationships? Why cant an independent, non-original, or non-integrist tradition of thought emerge in contemporary Islamic societies? Another fundamental assumption of this article is that in contemporary Islamic world, it is not only thought but also political thought and practices that dominate the thought domain and the religious field. It assumes that political thought in Islamic societies, whether in its modern or traditional form, redefines its unique civilizational imagination through human-God, human-universe, human-human, and human-society relationships.

 The aim of this article is to analyze the intellectual, mental, and ideological tensions between Islamic Civilization and Western Civilization, which are among the foremost economic, political, and diplomatic issues in the contemporary world. This analysis intends to explore these relations not only from the perspective of tension but also in terms of dialogue and tolerance. The method to be employed in this analysis aims to compare the tensioned relations between the two civilizations, both historically and methodologically, through a comparative approach, focusing on thought, mentality, and human context, with two different ideal types, Homo Economicus and Homo Islamicus. This analysis seeks to answer the following questions: Is the relationship between civilizations a tension that exists independently of man or arises from ideological political institutions above him? Has man and his rights been able to reach a competence to transcend political and ideological boundaries and establish a ground for dialogue and reconciliation? Are the projects developed concerning these dialogue and tolerance grounds of hegemonic design? Do definitions like identity and personality, shaped by societal and cultural accumulations, stem from hegemonic relationships? Why cant an independent, non-original, or non-integrist tradition of thought emerge in contemporary Islamic societies? Another fundamental assumption of this article is that in contemporary Islamic world, it is not only thought but also political thought and practices that dominate the thought domain and the religious field. It assumes that political thought in Islamic societies, whether in its modern or traditional form, redefines its unique civilizational imagination through human-God, human-universe, human-human, and human-society relationships.

 Bu makalenin amacı çağdaş dünyanın ekonomik, politik ve diplomatik sorunlarının başında gelen İslam Uygarlığı ile Batı Uygarlığı arasındaki düşünsel, zihinsel ve ideolojik gerilimli ilişkileri bu iki medeniyet ekseninde analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu ilişki sadece gerilim yönü ile değil diyalog ve tolerans alanları bakımından analiz edilecektir. Bu analizde kullanılacak yöntem hem tarihsel hem de metodolojik olarak iki uygarlık arasındaki gerilimli ilişkileri düşünce, zihniyet insan bağlamında iki farklı ideal tip olan Homo Economicus ve Homo İslamicus üzerinden karşılaştırmalı bir yöntemle analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu analizde şu sorulara cevap verilmeye çalışılacaktır. Uygarlıklar arasındaki ilişki insandan bağımsız ya da onun üstündeki ideolojik politik kurumlardan kaynaklanan bir gerilim midir? İnsan ve onun hakları siyasal ve ideolojik sınırları aşıp bir diyalog ve uzlaşma zeminini oluşturacak bir yetkinliğe ulaşabildi mi? Bu diyalog ve tolerans zeminleriyle ilgili geliştirilen projeler hegemonik bir tasarım mıdır? Toplumsal ve kültürel birikimlerin biçimlendirdiği kimlik ve kişilik gibi tanımlamalar hegemonik ilişkilerden mi kaynaklanmaktadır? Bugünki çağdaş İslam toplumlarında neden politik alandan bağımsız özgün ya da entegrist olmayan düşünce geleneği oluşamamaktadır. Bu makelenin diğer bir temel varsayımı çağdaş İslam dünyasında egemen olan düşüncenin salt felsefi düşünce değil siyasal düşünce ve pratiklerinin hem düşünce alanını hemde dinsel alanı baştan başa etkisi altına aldığı varsayımıdır. İslam toplumlarında siyasal düşüncenin ister modern biçimi olsun ister gelenekçi biçimi olsun kendi özgün uygarlık tahayyülünü insan-Tanrı insan-evren insan-insan insan-toplum ilişkileri üzerinden yeniden tanımlaması varsayımıdır.

Makale detayları

An Evaluation on the Typologies of Homo Islamicus and Homo Economicus in the Context of the Inter-Civilizational Relationship

Yazarlar:

Sait Ebinç

Yayıncı:

Van Yuzuncu Yıl University

Ana Başlıklar:

Kamu Yönetimi

Dergi:

Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Issue 62, pp.154-161

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001309259

pISSN:

1302-6879

Civilization

mentalty

westernization

İslammedeniyet

zihniyet

islam

batılılaşma

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Sait Ebinç

Yayıncı: Van Yuzuncu Yıl University

Ana Başlıklar: Kamu Yönetimi

Dergi: Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Issue 62, pp.154-161

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 12/2023

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001309259

pISSN: 1302-6879

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Sait Ebinç

Yayıncı:

Van Yuzuncu Yıl University

Ana Başlıklar:

Kamu Yönetimi

Dergi:

Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Issue 62, pp.154-161

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001309259

pISSN:

1302-6879