Evaluation of the Fracture Resistance of Roots Obturated with Bioceramic-Based Root Canal Sealer and Two Different Techniques

N.A.

Makale detayları

Evaluation of the Fracture Resistance of Roots Obturated with Bioceramic-Based Root Canal Sealer and Two Different Techniques

Yazarlar:

N.A.

Yayıncı:

Ataturk University

Ana Başlıklar:

Endodonti

Dergi:

Current Research in Dental Sciences Vol.35 Issue 2, pp.133-136

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2025

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001341903

pISSN:

2822-2555

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the fracture resistance FR of the teeth that had been filled using two different root canal-filling techniques and root canal sealers. Methods: Ninety single-rooted lower premolars, extracted for periodontal reasons, were selected. The crowns of the teeth were removed with diamond saw to obtain a root length of 13 mm. The working length of the teeth, excluding the negative control group, was advanced until the number 10 K-file inserted into the root canal was visible through the apical orifice, and the working length was measured to be 1 mm less than the visible length. The teeth were divided into 6 different groups n15. Group 1: unprepared and unfilled negative control, Group 2: prepared and unfilled positive control: Group 3: prepared and filled with Ceraseal CS  Single Cone Technique SCT, Group 4: prepared and CS  Cold Lateral Compaction Technique CLCT, Group 5: prepared and filled with AH Plus Jet AHPJ  SCT, Group 6: prepared and filled with AHPJ  CLCT. Vertical force was applied to the universal test machine until fracture occurred, and the maximum force required to fracture was recorded. Results: The Positive control group had significantly less FR than other groups, while the negative control group had significantly more FR than other groups P.05. Groups 3, 4, 5, and 6 did not differ significantly. P.05. Conclusions: There was no significant difference between root canal-filling sealer and techniques.

 Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the fracture resistance FR of the teeth that had been filled using two different root canal-filling techniques and root canal sealers. Methods: Ninety single-rooted lower premolars, extracted for periodontal reasons, were selected. The crowns of the teeth were removed with diamond saw to obtain a root length of 13 mm. The working length of the teeth, excluding the negative control group, was advanced until the number 10 K-file inserted into the root canal was visible through the apical orifice, and the working length was measured to be 1 mm less than the visible length. The teeth were divided into 6 different groups n15. Group 1: unprepared and unfilled negative control, Group 2: prepared and unfilled positive control: Group 3: prepared and filled with Ceraseal CS  Single Cone Technique SCT, Group 4: prepared and CS  Cold Lateral Compaction Technique CLCT, Group 5: prepared and filled with AH Plus Jet AHPJ  SCT, Group 6: prepared and filled with AHPJ  CLCT. Vertical force was applied to the universal test machine until fracture occurred, and the maximum force required to fracture was recorded. Results: The Positive control group had significantly less FR than other groups, while the negative control group had significantly more FR than other groups P.05. Groups 3, 4, 5, and 6 did not differ significantly. P.05. Conclusions: There was no significant difference between root canal-filling sealer and techniques.

 Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the fracture resistance FR of the teeth that had been filled using two different root canal-filling techniques and root canal sealers. Methods: Ninety single-rooted lower premolars, extracted for periodontal reasons, were selected. The crowns of the teeth were removed with diamond saw to obtain a root length of 13 mm. The working length of the teeth, excluding the negative control group, was advanced until the number 10 K-file inserted into the root canal was visible through the apical orifice, and the working length was measured to be 1 mm less than the visible length. The teeth were divided into 6 different groups n15. Group 1: unprepared and unfilled negative control, Group 2: prepared and unfilled positive control: Group 3: prepared and filled with Ceraseal CS  Single Cone Technique SCT, Group 4: prepared and CS  Cold Lateral Compaction Technique CLCT, Group 5: prepared and filled with AH Plus Jet AHPJ  SCT, Group 6: prepared and filled with AHPJ  CLCT. Vertical force was applied to the universal test machine until fracture occurred, and the maximum force required to fracture was recorded. Results: The Positive control group had significantly less FR than other groups, while the negative control group had significantly more FR than other groups P.05. Groups 3, 4, 5, and 6 did not differ significantly. P.05. Conclusions: There was no significant difference between root canal-filling sealer and techniques.

 Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the fracture resistance FR of the teeth that had been filled using two different root canal-filling techniques and root canal sealers. Methods: Ninety single-rooted lower premolars, extracted for periodontal reasons, were selected. The crowns of the teeth were removed with diamond saw to obtain a root length of 13 mm. The working length of the teeth, excluding the negative control group, was advanced until the number 10 K-file inserted into the root canal was visible through the apical orifice, and the working length was measured to be 1 mm less than the visible length. The teeth were divided into 6 different groups n15. Group 1: unprepared and unfilled negative control, Group 2: prepared and unfilled positive control: Group 3: prepared and filled with Ceraseal CS  Single Cone Technique SCT, Group 4: prepared and CS  Cold Lateral Compaction Technique CLCT, Group 5: prepared and filled with AH Plus Jet AHPJ  SCT, Group 6: prepared and filled with AHPJ  CLCT. Vertical force was applied to the universal test machine until fracture occurred, and the maximum force required to fracture was recorded. Results: The Positive control group had significantly less FR than other groups, while the negative control group had significantly more FR than other groups P.05. Groups 3, 4, 5, and 6 did not differ significantly. P.05. Conclusions: There was no significant difference between root canal-filling sealer and techniques.

Makale detayları

Evaluation of the Fracture Resistance of Roots Obturated with Bioceramic-Based Root Canal Sealer and Two Different Techniques

Yazarlar:

N.A.

Yayıncı:

Ataturk University

Ana Başlıklar:

Endodonti

Dergi:

Current Research in Dental Sciences Vol.35 Issue 2, pp.133-136

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2025

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001341903

pISSN:

2822-2555

Calcium silicate-based sealer

Root canal filling technique

Fracture resistance

Sayı

Makale detayları

Evaluation of the Fracture Resistance of Roots Obturated with Bioceramic-Based Root Canal Sealer and Two Different Techniques

Yazarlar: N.A.

Yayıncı: Ataturk University

Ana Başlıklar: Endodonti

Dergi: Current Research in Dental Sciences Vol.35 Issue 2, pp.133-136

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 4/2025

Belge Dili: İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.): 2001341903

pISSN: 2822-2555

Calcium silicate-based sealer

Root canal filling technique

Fracture resistance

Sayı

Yazarlar:

N.A.

Yayıncı:

Ataturk University

Ana Başlıklar:

Endodonti

Dergi:

Current Research in Dental Sciences Vol.35 Issue 2, pp.133-136

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2025

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001341903

pISSN:

2822-2555