APPROACHES OF EDUCATION AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL RESEARCH OFFICER DOCTOR AND NURSE/MIBES TO VACCINE HESITANCY

Hatice İkiışık; Filiz Sever; Işıl Maral

Makale detayları

APPROACHES OF EDUCATION AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL RESEARCH OFFICER DOCTOR AND NURSE/MIBES TO VACCINE HESITANCY

Yazarlar:

Hatice İkiışık | Filiz Sever | Işıl Maral

Yayıncı:

Erciyes University

Ana Başlıklar:

İç Hastalıkları

Dergi:

Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi Vol.32 Issue 3, pp.411-417

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001303661

pISSN:

1018-3655

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 In this study, it is aimed to evaluate the approaches of research assistant doctors and midwivesnurses in a training and research hospital to vaccine hesitancy. The research is of descriptive type and was carried out on 263 participants. The data were collected under observation with a questionnaire consisting of 14 items. Of the research participants, 74.9 are women, and 57.4 are research assistant doctors, 10.3 of the participants stated that they knew all the vaccine contents, 88.1 of the research assistant doctors and 50.9 of the nursesmidwives stated that they always directed their patients to have vaccines appropriate for their risk group and age p0.001, 52.5 of the participants stated that those who were hesitant about vaccination were absolutely are absolutely unjustified, 50 of the staff working in the family medicine department state that they try to persuade a patient who refuses to get vaccinated until they get vaccinated, 43 state that they explain its necessity and leave it to the individuals discretion whether to have it or not inter-segment p0.037. The percentage of those who regarded their knowledge level as good 86.7 and always referred their patients to vaccination were higher than those who evaluated their knowledge level as moderate 30.5 and poor 11.1. Recently, the question of the most important reason for vaccine hesitancy was answered by social media 37.7, and the question of what should be done to reduce vaccine hesitancy was to increase public education 81.0. Higher knowledge, awareness and attitudes among healthcare professionals may be associated with higher societal and individual vaccination intentions.

 In this study, it is aimed to evaluate the approaches of research assistant doctors and midwivesnurses in a training and research hospital to vaccine hesitancy. The research is of descriptive type and was carried out on 263 participants. The data were collected under observation with a questionnaire consisting of 14 items. Of the research participants, 74.9 are women, and 57.4 are research assistant doctors, 10.3 of the participants stated that they knew all the vaccine contents, 88.1 of the research assistant doctors and 50.9 of the nursesmidwives stated that they always directed their patients to have vaccines appropriate for their risk group and age p0.001, 52.5 of the participants stated that those who were hesitant about vaccination were absolutely are absolutely unjustified, 50 of the staff working in the family medicine department state that they try to persuade a patient who refuses to get vaccinated until they get vaccinated, 43 state that they explain its necessity and leave it to the individuals discretion whether to have it or not inter-segment p0.037. The percentage of those who regarded their knowledge level as good 86.7 and always referred their patients to vaccination were higher than those who evaluated their knowledge level as moderate 30.5 and poor 11.1. Recently, the question of the most important reason for vaccine hesitancy was answered by social media 37.7, and the question of what should be done to reduce vaccine hesitancy was to increase public education 81.0. Higher knowledge, awareness and attitudes among healthcare professionals may be associated with higher societal and individual vaccination intentions.

 In this study, it is aimed to evaluate the approaches of research assistant doctors and midwivesnurses in a training and research hospital to vaccine hesitancy. The research is of descriptive type and was carried out on 263 participants. The data were collected under observation with a questionnaire consisting of 14 items. Of the research participants, 74.9 are women, and 57.4 are research assistant doctors, 10.3 of the participants stated that they knew all the vaccine contents, 88.1 of the research assistant doctors and 50.9 of the nursesmidwives stated that they always directed their patients to have vaccines appropriate for their risk group and age p0.001, 52.5 of the participants stated that those who were hesitant about vaccination were absolutely are absolutely unjustified, 50 of the staff working in the family medicine department state that they try to persuade a patient who refuses to get vaccinated until they get vaccinated, 43 state that they explain its necessity and leave it to the individuals discretion whether to have it or not inter-segment p0.037. The percentage of those who regarded their knowledge level as good 86.7 and always referred their patients to vaccination were higher than those who evaluated their knowledge level as moderate 30.5 and poor 11.1. Recently, the question of the most important reason for vaccine hesitancy was answered by social media 37.7, and the question of what should be done to reduce vaccine hesitancy was to increase public education 81.0. Higher knowledge, awareness and attitudes among healthcare professionals may be associated with higher societal and individual vaccination intentions.

 Bu çalışmada bir eğitim ve araştırma hastanesindeki araştırma görevlisi doktor ve ebehemşirelerin aşı kararsızlığına yaklaşımlarını değerlendirmek amaçlanmaktadır. Araştırma tanımlayıcı tipte olup, 263 katılımcı üzerinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Veriler 14 sorudan oluşan anket ile gözlem altında toplanmıştır. Araştırmaya katılanların 74.9u kadın, 57.4ü araştırma görevlisi doktordur. Katılımcıların 10.3ü tüm aşı içeriklerini bildiklerini ifade etmiştir. Araştırma görevlisi doktorların 88.1i, hemşireebelerin 50.9u her zaman hastalarını risk grubuna ve yaşına uygun aşıları yaptırmaları için yönlendirdiğini belirtmiştir p0.001. Katılımcıların 52.5 aşı kararsızlığındaki kişileri kesinlikle haksız bulduklarını ifade etmektedirler. Aile hekimliği bölümünde çalışanların 50si aşı yaptırmayı kabul etmeyen bir hastayı aşı yaptırana kadar ikna etmeye çalıştığını, 43ü gerekliliğini anlatıp, yaptırıp yaptırmamayı kişilere bıraktığını ifade etmektedir bölümler arası p0.037. Bilgi düzeyini iyi 86.7 olarak ifade edenlerin hastalarını her zaman aşıya yönlendirme durumu da bilgi düzeyini orta 30.5 ve kötü 11.1 olarak değerlendirenlere göre daha yüksekti. Son zamanlarda aşı kararsızlığının en önemli nedeni sorusuna en sık olarak sosyal medya 37.7, aşı kararsızlığını azaltmak için neler yapılması gerektiği sorusuna halk eğitimleri arttırılması gerektiği 81.0 şeklinde cevap vermişlerdir. Sağlık çalışanları arasında daha yüksek bilgi, farkındalık ve tutumlar daha yüksek toplumsal ve bireysel aşılama niyeti ile ilişkilendirilebilir.

Makale detayları

APPROACHES OF EDUCATION AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL RESEARCH OFFICER DOCTOR AND NURSE/MIBES TO VACCINE HESITANCY

Yazarlar:

Hatice İkiışık | Filiz Sever | Işıl Maral

Yayıncı:

Erciyes University

Ana Başlıklar:

İç Hastalıkları

Dergi:

Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi Vol.32 Issue 3, pp.411-417

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001303661

pISSN:

1018-3655

Vaccine

vaccine hesitancy

Healthcare workerAşı

Aşı kararsızlığı

Sağlık Çalışanı

Sayı

Makale detayları

APPROACHES OF EDUCATION AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL RESEARCH OFFICER DOCTOR AND NURSE/MIBES TO VACCINE HESITANCY

Yazarlar: Hatice İkiışık | Filiz Sever | Işıl Maral

Yayıncı: Erciyes University

Ana Başlıklar: İç Hastalıkları

Dergi: Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi Vol.32 Issue 3, pp.411-417

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 4/2023

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001303661

pISSN: 1018-3655

Vaccine

vaccine hesitancy

Healthcare workerAşı

Aşı kararsızlığı

Sağlık Çalışanı

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Hatice İkiışık | Filiz Sever | Işıl Maral

Yayıncı:

Erciyes University

Ana Başlıklar:

İç Hastalıkları

Dergi:

Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi Vol.32 Issue 3, pp.411-417

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001303661

pISSN:

1018-3655