RE-ENTITLEMENT OF THE PREVIOUS TENANT TO THE PROPERTY RIGHT IN EXPROPRIATION WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DE-CREE WITH APPLICATION NUMBER 2019/4794

Asuman Çapar

Makale detayları

RE-ENTITLEMENT OF THE PREVIOUS TENANT TO THE PROPERTY RIGHT IN EXPROPRIATION WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DE-CREE WITH APPLICATION NUMBER 2019/4794

Yazarlar:

Asuman Çapar

Yayıncı:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk

Dergi:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.27 Issue 1, pp.219-252

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

1/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001283833

pISSN:

2651-4141

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Expropriation is among the operations that intervenes with the pro-perty right of individuals in which the public benefit and the benefit of the individual are in conflict where public benefit is considered superior. The present study has examined the instances in which the previous tenant may be re-entitled to the property right for the im-movable within the framework of the decree by the Constitutional Court with application number 20194794 and individual applica-tion file dated 1812022. Preventing the immovable from being as-signed to public use for a long period after expropriation, preventing the previous tenant from benefiting from the increase in the value of the immovable during this period may be considered as an immod-erate infringement of the property right. In this scope, even though many revisions have been made in item 22 of the Law of Expropria-tion, the problems in execution are still yet to be overcome. There is a need to solve the legal and de facto impracticalities that emerge following the finalization of the expropriation decree. The time limit imposed in item 223 of the Law of Expropriation also leads to other problems. On the other hand, item 23 of the Law of Expropriation should also be re-evaluated in order to ensure that the individuals may effectively use their reclamation rights.

 Expropriation is among the operations that intervenes with the pro-perty right of individuals in which the public benefit and the benefit of the individual are in conflict where public benefit is considered superior. The present study has examined the instances in which the previous tenant may be re-entitled to the property right for the im-movable within the framework of the decree by the Constitutional Court with application number 20194794 and individual applica-tion file dated 1812022. Preventing the immovable from being as-signed to public use for a long period after expropriation, preventing the previous tenant from benefiting from the increase in the value of the immovable during this period may be considered as an immod-erate infringement of the property right. In this scope, even though many revisions have been made in item 22 of the Law of Expropria-tion, the problems in execution are still yet to be overcome. There is a need to solve the legal and de facto impracticalities that emerge following the finalization of the expropriation decree. The time limit imposed in item 223 of the Law of Expropriation also leads to other problems. On the other hand, item 23 of the Law of Expropriation should also be re-evaluated in order to ensure that the individuals may effectively use their reclamation rights.

 Expropriation is among the operations that intervenes with the pro-perty right of individuals in which the public benefit and the benefit of the individual are in conflict where public benefit is considered superior. The present study has examined the instances in which the previous tenant may be re-entitled to the property right for the im-movable within the framework of the decree by the Constitutional Court with application number 20194794 and individual applica-tion file dated 1812022. Preventing the immovable from being as-signed to public use for a long period after expropriation, preventing the previous tenant from benefiting from the increase in the value of the immovable during this period may be considered as an immod-erate infringement of the property right. In this scope, even though many revisions have been made in item 22 of the Law of Expropria-tion, the problems in execution are still yet to be overcome. There is a need to solve the legal and de facto impracticalities that emerge following the finalization of the expropriation decree. The time limit imposed in item 223 of the Law of Expropriation also leads to other problems. On the other hand, item 23 of the Law of Expropriation should also be re-evaluated in order to ensure that the individuals may effectively use their reclamation rights.

 Kamulaştırma işlemi, kamu yararı ile bireyin yararının çatıştığı ve bu çatışmada kamu yararının üstün tutulduğu, kişilerin mülkiyet hakkına müdahale eden işlemlerden birisidir. Çalışmada Anayasa Mahkemesinin 20194794 başvuru numaralı, 1812022 tarihli bi-reysel başvuru dosyası kapsamında vermiş olduğu karar çerçevesin-de, kamulaştırma işleminde eski malikin taşınmaz mülkiyetini geri edinebileceği haller tahlil edilmiştir. Kamulaştırma işleminden sonra uzunca bir süre kamulaştırılan taşınmazın kamu yararı amacına tahsis edilmemesi, bu süreçte taşınmazın değerinde meydana gelen artıştan eski malikin faydalandırılmaması, mülkiyet hakkının ölçüsüz bir şekilde ihlali anlamına gelebilir. Bu kapsamda Kamulaştırma Kanununun 22. maddesi, üzerinde pek çok defa düzenleme yapılmış olmasına rağmen hâlâ uygulamada ortaya çıkan bir kısım sorunları giderici bir hâl almamıştır. Kamulaştırma kararının kesinleşmesin-den sonra ortaya çıkan hukuki ve fiili imkânsızlık hallerine çözüm getirmemektedir. Kamulaştırma Kanunu madde 223te getirilen süre sınırı ise ayrı sorunlar doğurmaktadır. Diğer yandan Kamulaş-tırma Kanununun 23. maddesi de bireylerin geri alma hakkını etkin kullanabilmeleri için yeniden ele alınmalıdır.

Makale detayları

RE-ENTITLEMENT OF THE PREVIOUS TENANT TO THE PROPERTY RIGHT IN EXPROPRIATION WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DE-CREE WITH APPLICATION NUMBER 2019/4794

Yazarlar:

Asuman Çapar

Yayıncı:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk

Dergi:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.27 Issue 1, pp.219-252

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

1/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001283833

pISSN:

2651-4141

Expropriation

Property right

Reclamation right of the previous tenant

Renouncement of expropriation

Legal impracticality.

Kamulaştırma

Mülkiyet hakkı

Eski malikin geri alma hakkı

Kamu-laştırmadan vazgeçme

Hukuki imkânsızlık.

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Asuman Çapar

Yayıncı: Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University

Ana Başlıklar: Hukuk

Dergi: Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.27 Issue 1, pp.219-252

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 1/2023

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001283833

pISSN: 2651-4141

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Asuman Çapar

Yayıncı:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk

Dergi:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.27 Issue 1, pp.219-252

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

1/2023

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001283833

pISSN:

2651-4141