Between Virtual Space and Real Space: Transition Spaces

İsmail Emre Kavut; Betül İrem Tarakçı

Makale detayları

Between Virtual Space and Real Space: Transition Spaces

Yazarlar:

İsmail Emre Kavut | Betül İrem Tarakçı

Yayıncı:

Süleyman Demirel University

Ana Başlıklar:

Interior Architecture

Dergi:

Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications Vol.8 Issue 1, pp.178-187

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

7/2023

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001289987

pISSN:

2548-0170

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 The space that is virtual in the planning processes is the one that is not experienced physically. With unlimited changes in virtual space 23 dimensional sketchesdrawings, the desired location is reached in a short time. The structures which are implemented, after the planning process had finished, space is now a real space that can be experienced physically, its boundaries are defined and transformed. However, unlike virtual space, it may require serious cost and time for changes caused by small errors, revisions, or needs that will occur. Starting from this point, decoupling between the transitional spaces in the virtual and real space are described in the study. The main emphasis of the study is to explain how to transition spaces are separated from virtual and real spaces and what are their advantages and disadvantages during use with selected examples. The empirical method, which is one of the quantitative research types, was used. First of all, the meaning pattern of the concept of space was examined within the framework of the concept definitions of virtuality, reality, and transitivity. Virtual, real, and transitional spaces are explained by literature surveys. The transition locations were analyzed with selected samples. As a result, when the characteristics of the spaces are compared, it is seen that the transition spaces, with their flexibility, easy changeability, limitlessness, and timelessness, can analyze the spaces needed before building new buildings. It has been seen that the transition from the physical being space to another space and the space in which the transition is made can be experienced mentally.

 The space that is virtual in the planning processes is the one that is not experienced physically. With unlimited changes in virtual space 23 dimensional sketchesdrawings, the desired location is reached in a short time. The structures which are implemented, after the planning process had finished, space is now a real space that can be experienced physically, its boundaries are defined and transformed. However, unlike virtual space, it may require serious cost and time for changes caused by small errors, revisions, or needs that will occur. Starting from this point, decoupling between the transitional spaces in the virtual and real space are described in the study. The main emphasis of the study is to explain how to transition spaces are separated from virtual and real spaces and what are their advantages and disadvantages during use with selected examples. The empirical method, which is one of the quantitative research types, was used. First of all, the meaning pattern of the concept of space was examined within the framework of the concept definitions of virtuality, reality, and transitivity. Virtual, real, and transitional spaces are explained by literature surveys. The transition locations were analyzed with selected samples. As a result, when the characteristics of the spaces are compared, it is seen that the transition spaces, with their flexibility, easy changeability, limitlessness, and timelessness, can analyze the spaces needed before building new buildings. It has been seen that the transition from the physical being space to another space and the space in which the transition is made can be experienced mentally.

 The space that is virtual in the planning processes is the one that is not experienced physically. With unlimited changes in virtual space 23 dimensional sketchesdrawings, the desired location is reached in a short time. The structures which are implemented, after the planning process had finished, space is now a real space that can be experienced physically, its boundaries are defined and transformed. However, unlike virtual space, it may require serious cost and time for changes caused by small errors, revisions, or needs that will occur. Starting from this point, decoupling between the transitional spaces in the virtual and real space are described in the study. The main emphasis of the study is to explain how to transition spaces are separated from virtual and real spaces and what are their advantages and disadvantages during use with selected examples. The empirical method, which is one of the quantitative research types, was used. First of all, the meaning pattern of the concept of space was examined within the framework of the concept definitions of virtuality, reality, and transitivity. Virtual, real, and transitional spaces are explained by literature surveys. The transition locations were analyzed with selected samples. As a result, when the characteristics of the spaces are compared, it is seen that the transition spaces, with their flexibility, easy changeability, limitlessness, and timelessness, can analyze the spaces needed before building new buildings. It has been seen that the transition from the physical being space to another space and the space in which the transition is made can be experienced mentally.

 Planlama süreçlerinde sanal olan mekân, fizikken deneyimlenmeyen zihnen 23 boyutlu eskizçizimlerle sınırsız değişiklikle kısa sürede istenen mekân çözümlerine ulaşılabilir. Planlama sürecinden sonra uygulanan yapılarda mekân artık fizikken deneyimlenebilen sınırları belli ve dönüşebilen gerçek mekanlardır. Fakat yapılacak küçük hatalardan, revizelerden veya ihtiyaçlardan kaynaklı değişimler için sanal mekândan farklı olarak ciddi maliyet ve zaman gerektirebilir. Bu noktadan hareketle çalışmada sanal ve gerçek mekân ara kesitindeki geçiş mekanlar açıklanmıştır. Çalışmanın temel vurgusu geçiş mekanlarının, sanal ve gerçek mekândan nasıl ayrıldığını, kullanım süresince avantajlarının ve dezavantajlarının neler olduğunun seçilen örneklerle açıklanmasıdır. İlk olarak mekân kavramının anlam örüntüsü; sanallık, gerçeklik ve geçişlilik kavram tanımlamaları çerçevesinde incelenmiş; sanal, gerçek ve geçiş mekanlar literatür taramalarıyla açıklanmıştır. Geçiş mekanlar seçilen örneklerle analiz edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak mekanların özellikleri karşılaştırıldığında geçiş mekanlarının; esnekliği, kolay değişilebilirliği, sınırsızlığı ve zamansızlığıyla yeni binalar inşa etmeden ihtiyaç duyulan mekanların çözümlenebileceği fiziki olarak bulunulan mekândan başka mekâna geçişin ve geçiş yapılan mekânın zihnen deneyimlenebileceği görülmüştür.

Makale detayları

Between Virtual Space and Real Space: Transition Spaces

Yazarlar:

İsmail Emre Kavut | Betül İrem Tarakçı

Yayıncı:

Süleyman Demirel University

Ana Başlıklar:

Interior Architecture

Dergi:

Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications Vol.8 Issue 1, pp.178-187

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

7/2023

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001289987

pISSN:

2548-0170

Virtural Space

real space

transition spaceSanal mekân

gerçek mekân

geçiş mekân

Sayı

Makale detayları

Between Virtual Space and Real Space: Transition Spaces

Yazarlar: İsmail Emre Kavut | Betül İrem Tarakçı

Yayıncı: Süleyman Demirel University

Ana Başlıklar: Interior Architecture

Dergi: Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications Vol.8 Issue 1, pp.178-187

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 7/2023

Belge Dili: İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.): 2001289987

pISSN: 2548-0170

Virtural Space

real space

transition spaceSanal mekân

gerçek mekân

geçiş mekân

Sayı

Yazarlar:

İsmail Emre Kavut | Betül İrem Tarakçı

Yayıncı:

Süleyman Demirel University

Ana Başlıklar:

Interior Architecture

Dergi:

Journal of Architectural Sciences and Applications Vol.8 Issue 1, pp.178-187

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

7/2023

Belge Dili:

İngilizce

Document ID (Org No.):

2001289987

pISSN:

2548-0170