Can We Talk About A of Dullness or Collapse (al-Inḥıṭāṭ) in the History of Rhetoric? -A Reading in the Context of Contributions to Rhetoric Between the 5th and 7th Centuries Hijri-

İsa Güceyüz

Makale detayları

Can We Talk About A of Dullness or Collapse (al-Inḥıṭāṭ) in the History of Rhetoric? -A Reading in the Context of Contributions to Rhetoric Between the 5th and 7th Centuries Hijri-

Yazarlar:

İsa Güceyüz

Yayıncı:

Mardin Artuklu University

Ana Başlıklar:

Arap Dili ve Belagatı

Dergi:

Artuklu Akademi Vol.11 Issue 1, pp.99-118

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001321448

pISSN:

2148-3264

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Various periodizations are made regarding the history of Arabic literature and rhetoric al-Balāġah. In this study, the issue of periodizing Arabic literature and rhetoric and whether there can be a period of dullness or decline al-ınḥıṭāṭ in the history of rhetoric is discussed. Opinions regarding the beginning and end of the dulling period are put forward with their justifications and objections. In this context, some authors date the beginning of dullness to the second century of the Hijri calendar, while others date it to the nineteenth century AD. The fact that there is no consensus on the dates when rhetoric allegedly became dull and that very important contributions were made to rhetoric between the fifth and seventh centuries of the Hijri calendar, which is at the center of the discussions about dullness, reveals that this period of rhetoric cannot be described as a period of dullness or collapse.

 Various periodizations are made regarding the history of Arabic literature and rhetoric al-Balāġah. In this study, the issue of periodizing Arabic literature and rhetoric and whether there can be a period of dullness or decline al-ınḥıṭāṭ in the history of rhetoric is discussed. Opinions regarding the beginning and end of the dulling period are put forward with their justifications and objections. In this context, some authors date the beginning of dullness to the second century of the Hijri calendar, while others date it to the nineteenth century AD. The fact that there is no consensus on the dates when rhetoric allegedly became dull and that very important contributions were made to rhetoric between the fifth and seventh centuries of the Hijri calendar, which is at the center of the discussions about dullness, reveals that this period of rhetoric cannot be described as a period of dullness or collapse.

 Various periodizations are made regarding the history of Arabic literature and rhetoric al-Balāġah. In this study, the issue of periodizing Arabic literature and rhetoric and whether there can be a period of dullness or decline al-ınḥıṭāṭ in the history of rhetoric is discussed. Opinions regarding the beginning and end of the dulling period are put forward with their justifications and objections. In this context, some authors date the beginning of dullness to the second century of the Hijri calendar, while others date it to the nineteenth century AD. The fact that there is no consensus on the dates when rhetoric allegedly became dull and that very important contributions were made to rhetoric between the fifth and seventh centuries of the Hijri calendar, which is at the center of the discussions about dullness, reveals that this period of rhetoric cannot be described as a period of dullness or collapse.

 Arap edebiyatı ve belâgat tarihiyle ilgili çeşitli dönemlendirmeler yapılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada Arap edebiyatı ve belâgatini dönemlendirme meselesi ve belâgat tarihinde bir donukluk veya çöküş inhitât döneminden bahsedilip bahsedilemeyeceği hususu tartışılmaktadır. Donuklaşma döneminin başlangıç ve bitişiyle ilgili görüşler gerekçe ve itirazlarıyla ortaya konulmaktadır. Bu bağlamda bazı müellifler donukluğun başlangıcını hicri ikinci asra kadar götürürken bazıları da miladi on dokuzuncu yüzyıla kadar getirmişlerdir. Belâgatin donuklaştığı iddia edilen tarihlerde ittifak olmaması ve donuklaşma tartışmalarının odağında yer alan hicri beşinci ve yedinci yüzyıl arasında belâgate çok önemli katkılar yapılması, belâgatin bu döneminin donukluk veya çöküş dönemi olarak nitelenemeyeceğini ortaya koymaktadır.

Makale detayları

Can We Talk About A of Dullness or Collapse (al-Inḥıṭāṭ) in the History of Rhetoric? -A Reading in the Context of Contributions to Rhetoric Between the 5th and 7th Centuries Hijri-

Yazarlar:

İsa Güceyüz

Yayıncı:

Mardin Artuklu University

Ana Başlıklar:

Arap Dili ve Belagatı

Dergi:

Artuklu Akademi Vol.11 Issue 1, pp.99-118

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001321448

pISSN:

2148-3264

Arabic Language and Rhetoric (al-Balāġah)

History of Rhetoric

Periods of Rhetoric

Dullness

Collapse (al-Inḥıṭāṭ)

Fifth and Seventh Centuries HijriArap Dili ve Belâgati

Belâgat Tarihi

Belâgatin Dönemleri

Donukluk

Çöküş

Hicri Beşinci ve Yedinci Yüzyıl

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: İsa Güceyüz

Yayıncı: Mardin Artuklu University

Ana Başlıklar: Arap Dili ve Belagatı

Dergi: Artuklu Akademi Vol.11 Issue 1, pp.99-118

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 6/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001321448

pISSN: 2148-3264

Sayı

Yazarlar:

İsa Güceyüz

Yayıncı:

Mardin Artuklu University

Ana Başlıklar:

Arap Dili ve Belagatı

Dergi:

Artuklu Akademi Vol.11 Issue 1, pp.99-118

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001321448

pISSN:

2148-3264