DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF INDIVIDUALS' PROSTHETIC TREATMENT CHOICES

Filiz Yağcı

Makale detayları

DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF INDIVIDUALS' PROSTHETIC TREATMENT CHOICES

Yazarlar:

Filiz Yağcı

Yayıncı:

Erciyes University

Ana Başlıklar:

Protez

Dergi:

Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi Vol.33 Issue 3, pp.358-366

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001335074

pISSN:

1018-3655

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 The aim of this study was to investigate the factors affecting tooth deficiencies and the preference for traditional fixedremovable dentures or implant-supported prostheses. Study included 231 individuals including 133 women and 98 men average age was 51 and 54 respectively who sought treatment for tooth loss and had indications for dental implants.The individualsage 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-75, educationlevel, frequency of tooth brushing, areas of missing teeth, place of residence, income level 0-2000 TL,2001-4000 TL, 4001 TL and above, implant treatment a wareness, the presence of any prosthetic restoration were recorded. In cases implant treatment was not preferred, the reasons were recorded. The data were analyzed using chi-square test p0.05. Individuals with no literacy and primary school graduates X228.137; p0.00, and those who brushed teeth less frequently than once a day, showed statistically significantly more anterior-posterior tooth deficiencies X216.780; p0.001. Nostatistical difference was observed among missing tooth areas based on income level X24.614;p0.260 and place of residence X21.953;p0.733. According to age groups, the number of those aware of dental implants in 60-75 age group was found to be significantly high. X26.856; p0.001Choice of implant-supported fixed prostheses was significantly higher in the income range of 2001-4000 TLcompared to implant-supported complete dentures.In the income range of 4001 TL and above, the preference of implant-supported fixed denturewas found to be significantly higher than removable partial, complete, or implant-supported complete dentures X219.587; p0.041In cases of anterior-posterior tooth loss, removable dentures were the most preferred restorations 32.86, followed by implant-supported fixed dentures 27.97. For posterior tooth loss, implant-supported fixed dentures were predominantly chosen. The most significant factor for not preferring implant treatment was cost 68.80. The preference of prosthetic restoration appears to be influenced by age, area of missing teeth, income level, and the type of prosthesis individuals previously used.

 The aim of this study was to investigate the factors affecting tooth deficiencies and the preference for traditional fixedremovable dentures or implant-supported prostheses. Study included 231 individuals including 133 women and 98 men average age was 51 and 54 respectively who sought treatment for tooth loss and had indications for dental implants.The individualsage 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-75, educationlevel, frequency of tooth brushing, areas of missing teeth, place of residence, income level 0-2000 TL,2001-4000 TL, 4001 TL and above, implant treatment a wareness, the presence of any prosthetic restoration were recorded. In cases implant treatment was not preferred, the reasons were recorded. The data were analyzed using chi-square test p0.05. Individuals with no literacy and primary school graduates X228.137; p0.00, and those who brushed teeth less frequently than once a day, showed statistically significantly more anterior-posterior tooth deficiencies X216.780; p0.001. Nostatistical difference was observed among missing tooth areas based on income level X24.614;p0.260 and place of residence X21.953;p0.733. According to age groups, the number of those aware of dental implants in 60-75 age group was found to be significantly high. X26.856; p0.001Choice of implant-supported fixed prostheses was significantly higher in the income range of 2001-4000 TLcompared to implant-supported complete dentures.In the income range of 4001 TL and above, the preference of implant-supported fixed denturewas found to be significantly higher than removable partial, complete, or implant-supported complete dentures X219.587; p0.041In cases of anterior-posterior tooth loss, removable dentures were the most preferred restorations 32.86, followed by implant-supported fixed dentures 27.97. For posterior tooth loss, implant-supported fixed dentures were predominantly chosen. The most significant factor for not preferring implant treatment was cost 68.80. The preference of prosthetic restoration appears to be influenced by age, area of missing teeth, income level, and the type of prosthesis individuals previously used.

 The aim of this study was to investigate the factors affecting tooth deficiencies and the preference for traditional fixedremovable dentures or implant-supported prostheses. Study included 231 individuals including 133 women and 98 men average age was 51 and 54 respectively who sought treatment for tooth loss and had indications for dental implants.The individualsage 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-75, educationlevel, frequency of tooth brushing, areas of missing teeth, place of residence, income level 0-2000 TL,2001-4000 TL, 4001 TL and above, implant treatment a wareness, the presence of any prosthetic restoration were recorded. In cases implant treatment was not preferred, the reasons were recorded. The data were analyzed using chi-square test p0.05. Individuals with no literacy and primary school graduates X228.137; p0.00, and those who brushed teeth less frequently than once a day, showed statistically significantly more anterior-posterior tooth deficiencies X216.780; p0.001. Nostatistical difference was observed among missing tooth areas based on income level X24.614;p0.260 and place of residence X21.953;p0.733. According to age groups, the number of those aware of dental implants in 60-75 age group was found to be significantly high. X26.856; p0.001Choice of implant-supported fixed prostheses was significantly higher in the income range of 2001-4000 TLcompared to implant-supported complete dentures.In the income range of 4001 TL and above, the preference of implant-supported fixed denturewas found to be significantly higher than removable partial, complete, or implant-supported complete dentures X219.587; p0.041In cases of anterior-posterior tooth loss, removable dentures were the most preferred restorations 32.86, followed by implant-supported fixed dentures 27.97. For posterior tooth loss, implant-supported fixed dentures were predominantly chosen. The most significant factor for not preferring implant treatment was cost 68.80. The preference of prosthetic restoration appears to be influenced by age, area of missing teeth, income level, and the type of prosthesis individuals previously used.

 Bu çalışmada diş eksikliğinde ve geleneksel sabithareketli protezler veya implant-üstü protezlerin tercih edilmesinde etkili olan faktörlerin anket yoluyla araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Çalışmaya diş eksikliği ve implant endikasyonu bulunan133 kadın ve 98 erkek yaş ortalamaları 51 ve 54 olmak üzere 231birey dahil edilmiştir. Bireylerin yaşı 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-75 öğrenim seviyesi, diş fırçalama sıklığı,eksik diş bölgeleri,yaşadığı yer,gelir seviyesi 0-2000 TL, 2001-4000 TL, 4001 TL ve üzeri, implant tedavisi hakkında bilgi sahibi olup olmadıkları,ağızda herhangi bir protetik restorasyon bulunup bulunmadığı ve uygulanacak protetik tedavi türü ile implant tedavisini tercih etmeyenlerin tercih etmeme sebepleri kaydedilmiştir.Veriler ki-kare testi ile analiz edilmiştirp0.05.Okur-yazar olmayanlarda, ilköğretim mezunlarında X228.137;p0.00; günde birden daha seyrek diş fırçalayanlarda anterior ve posterior bölgede istatistiksel olarak anlamlı şekilde daha fazla diş eksikliği görülmüştürX216.780;p0.001.Gelir seviyesine X24.614;p0.260 ve yaşadığı yere göre X21.953;p0.733 eksik diş bölgeleri istatistiksel farklılık göstermemiştir.Yaş grubuna göre bireylerin diş implantını duyup duymamaları incelendiğinde 60-75 yaş grubunda implantı duyanların sayısı istatistiksel olarak anlamlı şekilde daha yüksek bulunmuştur X26.856;p0.001.2001-4000 TL gelir seviyesinde implant-üstü tam proteze göre implant-üstü sabit protez tercihi istatistiksel olarak anlamlı şekilde yüksek bulunmuştur. 4001 TL ve üzeri gelir seviyesinde ise implant üzeri sabit protez tercihi hareketli bölümlü, tam veya implant üzeri tam proteze göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı şekilde fazla bulunmuştur X219.587; p0.041. Anterior-posterior diş eksikliğinde en fazla oranda hareketli protez32.86 yapımına karar verildiği, bunu implant-üstü sabit protezin27.97 izlediği görülmektedir. Posterior bölge diş eksikliklerinde en fazla oranda implant üstü sabit protezin tercih edildiği görülmüştür. İmplant tedavisinin tercih edilmemesinde en önemli etkenin 68.80oranında maliyet olduğu görülmüştür. Protetik restorasyon türünün seçiminde yaş, eksik diş bölgesi, gelir seviyesi, bireylerin önceden kullanmakta olduğu protez türünün etkili olduğu görülmüştür.

Makale detayları

DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF INDIVIDUALS' PROSTHETIC TREATMENT CHOICES

Yazarlar:

Filiz Yağcı

Yayıncı:

Erciyes University

Ana Başlıklar:

Protez

Dergi:

Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi Vol.33 Issue 3, pp.358-366

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001335074

pISSN:

1018-3655

Dental implant

tooth deficiency

removable denture

fixed dentureDental implant

diş kaybı

hareketli protez

sabit protez

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Filiz Yağcı

Yayıncı: Erciyes University

Ana Başlıklar: Protez

Dergi: Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi Vol.33 Issue 3, pp.358-366

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 12/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001335074

pISSN: 1018-3655

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Filiz Yağcı

Yayıncı:

Erciyes University

Ana Başlıklar:

Protez

Dergi:

Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi Vol.33 Issue 3, pp.358-366

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001335074

pISSN:

1018-3655