Violation of the Principle of Honesty and Its Consequences in Applying for Enforcement Proceedings

Uğur Bulut; Fazilet Yüce

Makale detayları

Violation of the Principle of Honesty and Its Consequences in Applying for Enforcement Proceedings

Yazarlar:

Uğur Bulut | Fazilet Yüce

Yayıncı:

Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk (Diğer) | Yasal Uygulama | Avukatlık ve Hukuk Mesleği

Dergi:

Yıldırım Beyazıt Hukuk Dergisi Issue 2, pp.773-832

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

7/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001356094

pISSN:

2149-5831

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 The principle of honesty, which is also valid in enforcement law, plays an important role in ensuring the balance of interests between parties. The creditors being bound by the principle of honesty while his right to apply enforcement proceedings is of particular importance in terms of holding the debtor liable for enforcement expenses. Because, according to the current regulations, the legal situation of the debtor who wants to pay his debt voluntarily by applying for enforcement proceedings becomes much more severe compared to the trial phase. Although there are exceptional provisions in our law, there is no general restriction on creditors right to apply enforcement proceedings, it should be possible for the creditor to use this right only within the framework of the principle of honesty. The debtor who wants to pay his debt and even fulfills his debt before or after the commencement of the enforcement proceedings, according to time of payment, should be protected against the creditor who uses his right to apply for enforcement proceedings in violation of the principle of honesty. This protection may be realized through complaint, adjournment of judgment debt or action for compensation. By making legal amendment regarding enforcement expenses in the line with the situation at the trial phase and by effective implementation of the aforementioned ways, it can be ensured that behaviors contrary to the principle of honesty are not protected by the legal order and finally the balance of interests between the parties can be ensured.

 The principle of honesty, which is also valid in enforcement law, plays an important role in ensuring the balance of interests between parties. The creditors being bound by the principle of honesty while his right to apply enforcement proceedings is of particular importance in terms of holding the debtor liable for enforcement expenses. Because, according to the current regulations, the legal situation of the debtor who wants to pay his debt voluntarily by applying for enforcement proceedings becomes much more severe compared to the trial phase. Although there are exceptional provisions in our law, there is no general restriction on creditors right to apply enforcement proceedings, it should be possible for the creditor to use this right only within the framework of the principle of honesty. The debtor who wants to pay his debt and even fulfills his debt before or after the commencement of the enforcement proceedings, according to time of payment, should be protected against the creditor who uses his right to apply for enforcement proceedings in violation of the principle of honesty. This protection may be realized through complaint, adjournment of judgment debt or action for compensation. By making legal amendment regarding enforcement expenses in the line with the situation at the trial phase and by effective implementation of the aforementioned ways, it can be ensured that behaviors contrary to the principle of honesty are not protected by the legal order and finally the balance of interests between the parties can be ensured.

 The principle of honesty, which is also valid in enforcement law, plays an important role in ensuring the balance of interests between parties. The creditors being bound by the principle of honesty while his right to apply enforcement proceedings is of particular importance in terms of holding the debtor liable for enforcement expenses. Because, according to the current regulations, the legal situation of the debtor who wants to pay his debt voluntarily by applying for enforcement proceedings becomes much more severe compared to the trial phase. Although there are exceptional provisions in our law, there is no general restriction on creditors right to apply enforcement proceedings, it should be possible for the creditor to use this right only within the framework of the principle of honesty. The debtor who wants to pay his debt and even fulfills his debt before or after the commencement of the enforcement proceedings, according to time of payment, should be protected against the creditor who uses his right to apply for enforcement proceedings in violation of the principle of honesty. This protection may be realized through complaint, adjournment of judgment debt or action for compensation. By making legal amendment regarding enforcement expenses in the line with the situation at the trial phase and by effective implementation of the aforementioned ways, it can be ensured that behaviors contrary to the principle of honesty are not protected by the legal order and finally the balance of interests between the parties can be ensured.

 İcra hukukunda da geçerli olan dürüstlük kuralı taraflar arasındaki menfaat dengesinin sağlanmasında önemli rol oynar. Alacaklının icra takibine başvururken dürüstlük kuralıyla bağlı olması borçlunun icra giderlerinden sorumlu tutulması bakımından özel bir önemi haizdir. Zira icra takibine başvurulmasıyla borcunu rızaen ödemek isteyen borçlunun hukukî durumu, mevcut düzenlemelere göre yargılama aşamasına oranla çok daha ağır hâle gelmektedir. Hukukumuzda -istisnai düzenlemeler bulunmakta birlikte- alacaklının icra takibine başvuruyu sınırlandırmaya yönelik genel bir sınırlama öngörülmemiş olsa da alacaklının bu hakkını dürüstlük kuralı çerçevesinde kullanabilmesi mümkün olmalıdır. Borcunu ödemek isteyen hatta takibin başlamasının öncesinde veya sonrasında borcunu ifa eden borçlunun, ödeme zamanıyla bağlantılı olarak dürüstlük kuralına aykırı şekilde icra takibine başvuran alacaklıya karşı korunması gerekmektedir. Bu korumanın şikâyet kurumu, icranın geri bırakılması kurumu veya tazminat davası yolu ile gerçekleştirilmesi değerlendirilebilir. İcra giderlerine ilişkin, yargılama aşamasındaki durumla uyumlu bir kanunî değişikliğin yapılması ve sayılan kurumların etkin bir şekilde işletilmesiyle, dürüstlük kuralına aykırı davranışların hukuk düzeni tarafından korunmaması ve nihayet icra takibinin tarafları arasındaki menfaat dengesi sağlanabilir.

Makale detayları

Violation of the Principle of Honesty and Its Consequences in Applying for Enforcement Proceedings

Yazarlar:

Uğur Bulut | Fazilet Yüce

Yayıncı:

Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk (Diğer) | Yasal Uygulama | Avukatlık ve Hukuk Mesleği

Dergi:

Yıldırım Beyazıt Hukuk Dergisi Issue 2, pp.773-832

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

7/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001356094

pISSN:

2149-5831

enforcement proceeding

motion for enforcement proceedings

principle of honesty

abuse of right

enforcement attorney fee

enforcement expenses.icra takibi

takip talebi

dürüstlük kuralı

hakkın kötüye kullanılması

icra vekâlet ücreti

icra giderleri.

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Uğur Bulut | Fazilet Yüce

Yayıncı: Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University

Ana Başlıklar: Hukuk (Diğer) | Yasal Uygulama | Avukatlık ve Hukuk Mesleği

Dergi: Yıldırım Beyazıt Hukuk Dergisi Issue 2, pp.773-832

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 7/2025

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001356094

pISSN: 2149-5831

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Uğur Bulut | Fazilet Yüce

Yayıncı:

Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk (Diğer) | Yasal Uygulama | Avukatlık ve Hukuk Mesleği

Dergi:

Yıldırım Beyazıt Hukuk Dergisi Issue 2, pp.773-832

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

7/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001356094

pISSN:

2149-5831