The Effect of the Mediation Process in the Eviction of Residences or Roofed Workplaces Due to Necessity on Article 355 of the Turkish Code of Obligations

Hakkı Mert Doğu

Makale detayları

The Effect of the Mediation Process in the Eviction of Residences or Roofed Workplaces Due to Necessity on Article 355 of the Turkish Code of Obligations

Yazarlar:

Hakkı Mert Doğu

Yayıncı:

Anadolu University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Anadolu Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.10 Issue 2, pp.373-387

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

1/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001324234

pISSN:

2687-394X

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Lease contracts regulated in Articles 299 and following of the Turkish Code of Obligations are subject to a threefold distinction by the legislator. One of these distinctions is residential and roofed workplace lease contracts. Residential and roofed workplace lease contracts can be terminated in two ways: by notification and by lawsuit. One of the ways in which residential and roofed workplace lease contracts can be terminated through litigation is eviction eviction case for need. The lessor may terminate the lease contract if he is obliged to use the leased property for himself, his spouse, his descendants, his ancestors or other persons he is obliged to look after by law, due to housing or workplace needs. Eviction case for need, mediation as a condition of litigation comes to the fore before the lawsuit to be filed in the termination of the lease contract. During the mediation process in question, the consequences that may arise if the parties agree on an eviction but the lessor does not comply with the re-letting prohibition in Article 355 of the Turkish Code of Obligations must be examined. Particular attention should be paid to the effect of the mediation process on Article 355 of the Turkish Code of Obligations. In the study, the effect of the mediation process in the evacuation of residences or roofed workplaces eviction case for need on Article 355 of the Turkish Code of Obligations and its possible consequences are examined.

 Lease contracts regulated in Articles 299 and following of the Turkish Code of Obligations are subject to a threefold distinction by the legislator. One of these distinctions is residential and roofed workplace lease contracts. Residential and roofed workplace lease contracts can be terminated in two ways: by notification and by lawsuit. One of the ways in which residential and roofed workplace lease contracts can be terminated through litigation is eviction eviction case for need. The lessor may terminate the lease contract if he is obliged to use the leased property for himself, his spouse, his descendants, his ancestors or other persons he is obliged to look after by law, due to housing or workplace needs. Eviction case for need, mediation as a condition of litigation comes to the fore before the lawsuit to be filed in the termination of the lease contract. During the mediation process in question, the consequences that may arise if the parties agree on an eviction but the lessor does not comply with the re-letting prohibition in Article 355 of the Turkish Code of Obligations must be examined. Particular attention should be paid to the effect of the mediation process on Article 355 of the Turkish Code of Obligations. In the study, the effect of the mediation process in the evacuation of residences or roofed workplaces eviction case for need on Article 355 of the Turkish Code of Obligations and its possible consequences are examined.

 Lease contracts regulated in Articles 299 and following of the Turkish Code of Obligations are subject to a threefold distinction by the legislator. One of these distinctions is residential and roofed workplace lease contracts. Residential and roofed workplace lease contracts can be terminated in two ways: by notification and by lawsuit. One of the ways in which residential and roofed workplace lease contracts can be terminated through litigation is eviction eviction case for need. The lessor may terminate the lease contract if he is obliged to use the leased property for himself, his spouse, his descendants, his ancestors or other persons he is obliged to look after by law, due to housing or workplace needs. Eviction case for need, mediation as a condition of litigation comes to the fore before the lawsuit to be filed in the termination of the lease contract. During the mediation process in question, the consequences that may arise if the parties agree on an eviction but the lessor does not comply with the re-letting prohibition in Article 355 of the Turkish Code of Obligations must be examined. Particular attention should be paid to the effect of the mediation process on Article 355 of the Turkish Code of Obligations. In the study, the effect of the mediation process in the evacuation of residences or roofed workplaces eviction case for need on Article 355 of the Turkish Code of Obligations and its possible consequences are examined.

 Türk Borçlar Kanununun 299 vd. maddelerinde düzenlenen kira sözleşmeleri, kanun koyucu tarafından üçlü bir ayrıma tabi tutulmaktadır. Bu ayrımlardan biri konut ve çatılı işyeri kirası sözleşmeleridir. Konut ve çatılı işyeri kirası sözleşmeleri, bildirim ve dava yoluyla olmak üzere iki türlü sona erdirilebilmektedir. Dava yoluyla konut ve çatılı işyeri kirası sözleşmelerinin sona erdirilmesi hâllerinden bir tanesi ihtiyaç sebebiyle tahliyedir. Kiraya veren kiralananı kendisi, eşi, altsoyu, üstsoyu veya kanun gereği bakmakla yükümlü olduğu diğer kişiler için konut ya da işyeri gereksinimi sebebiyle kullanma zorunluluğu varsa kira sözleşmesini sona erdirebilir. İhtiyaç sebebiyle kira sözleşmesinin sona erdirilmesinde açılacak davadan önce dava şartı arabuluculuk gündeme gelmektedir. Söz konusu arabuluculuk sürecinde tarafların tahliye hususunda anlaşmaları ve fakat kiraya verenin Türk Borçlar Kanununun 355. maddesindeki yeniden kiralama yasağına uymaması durumunda ortaya çıkabilecek sonuçların incelenmesi gerekir. Özellikle arabuluculuk sürecinin Türk Borçlar Kanununun 355. maddesine etkisi üzerinde durulmalıdır. Çalışmada konut veya çatılı işyerlerinin ihtiyaç sebebiyle tahliyesindeki arabuluculuk sürecinin Türk Borçlar Kanununun 355. maddesine etkisi ve bunun olası sonuçları incelenmektedir.

Makale detayları

The Effect of the Mediation Process in the Eviction of Residences or Roofed Workplaces Due to Necessity on Article 355 of the Turkish Code of Obligations

Yazarlar:

Hakkı Mert Doğu

Yayıncı:

Anadolu University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Anadolu Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.10 Issue 2, pp.373-387

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

1/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001324234

pISSN:

2687-394X

Lease Contract

Eviction Case for Need

Lease Dipsute

Mandatory Mediation

Prohibition of Re-LeasingKira Sözleşmesi

İhtiyaç Sebebiyle Tahliye Davası

Kira Uyuşmazlığı

Dava Şartı Arabuluculuk

Yeniden Kiralama Yasağı

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Hakkı Mert Doğu

Yayıncı: Anadolu University

Ana Başlıklar: Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi: Anadolu Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.10 Issue 2, pp.373-387

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 1/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001324234

pISSN: 2687-394X

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Hakkı Mert Doğu

Yayıncı:

Anadolu University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Anadolu Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.10 Issue 2, pp.373-387

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

1/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001324234

pISSN:

2687-394X