THE IMPACT OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTS IN ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE PROCEDURE

Miray Özhan

Makale detayları

THE IMPACT OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTS IN ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE PROCEDURE

Yazarlar:

Miray Özhan

Yayıncı:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk ve Beşeri Bilimler | Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.29 Issue 1, pp.367-411

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

1/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001340243

pISSN:

2651-4141

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Confidential information and documents relating to the interests of the State or individuals may be evidence in the judicial review of an administrative act. In this case, the interests of the state or individuals in protecting such information conflict with the interests of the parties in protecting the right of access to information and documents. It is the duty of the legislature to determine how this conflict of interest is to be resolved. Article 20 of the Code on Administrative Procedure stipulates that information and documents relating to the security or high interests of the State or foreign states together with the security and high interests of the State may be kept confidential from the judicial proceedings. Furthermore, in 2020, the phrase examination of the file by the parties and interested parties was added to Article 31 regulating the referred circumstances to the Code of Civil Procedure. The relevant article authorizes the judge to order certain information to be kept confidential. These regulations interfere with the right to a fair trial by restricting the parties access to information and documents. The uncertainty of the regulations and the lack of necessary safeguards make the legality of the intervention questionable.

 Confidential information and documents relating to the interests of the State or individuals may be evidence in the judicial review of an administrative act. In this case, the interests of the state or individuals in protecting such information conflict with the interests of the parties in protecting the right of access to information and documents. It is the duty of the legislature to determine how this conflict of interest is to be resolved. Article 20 of the Code on Administrative Procedure stipulates that information and documents relating to the security or high interests of the State or foreign states together with the security and high interests of the State may be kept confidential from the judicial proceedings. Furthermore, in 2020, the phrase examination of the file by the parties and interested parties was added to Article 31 regulating the referred circumstances to the Code of Civil Procedure. The relevant article authorizes the judge to order certain information to be kept confidential. These regulations interfere with the right to a fair trial by restricting the parties access to information and documents. The uncertainty of the regulations and the lack of necessary safeguards make the legality of the intervention questionable.

 Confidential information and documents relating to the interests of the State or individuals may be evidence in the judicial review of an administrative act. In this case, the interests of the state or individuals in protecting such information conflict with the interests of the parties in protecting the right of access to information and documents. It is the duty of the legislature to determine how this conflict of interest is to be resolved. Article 20 of the Code on Administrative Procedure stipulates that information and documents relating to the security or high interests of the State or foreign states together with the security and high interests of the State may be kept confidential from the judicial proceedings. Furthermore, in 2020, the phrase examination of the file by the parties and interested parties was added to Article 31 regulating the referred circumstances to the Code of Civil Procedure. The relevant article authorizes the judge to order certain information to be kept confidential. These regulations interfere with the right to a fair trial by restricting the parties access to information and documents. The uncertainty of the regulations and the lack of necessary safeguards make the legality of the intervention questionable.

 Devletin veya bireylerin menfaatlerine ilişkin gizli bilgi ve belgeler, idari işlemin hukuka uygunluk denetiminde delil teşkil edebilmektedir. Bu halde, devletin veya bireylerin bu tür bilgilerinin korunmasındaki menfaatleri ile tarafların bilgi ve belgelere erişme hakkının korunmasındaki menfaatleri çatışmaktadır. Söz konusu menfaat çatışmasının nasıl çözüleceğini belirlemek kanun koyucunun ödevidir. 2577 sayılı İdari Yargılama Usul Kanununun İYUK 20. maddesinde Devletin güvenliğine veya yüksek menfaatlerine veya Devletin güvenliği ve yüksek menfaatleriyle birlikte yabancı devletlere ilişkin bilgi ve belgelerin yargılamadan gizli tutulabileceğine ilişkin bir düzenleme yer almaktadır. Ayrıca 2020 yılında İYUKun 31. maddesiyle düzenlenen Hukuk Usulü Muhakemeleri Kanununa HMK Atıf Yapılan Haller arasına dosyanın taraflar ve ilgililerce incelenmesi ibaresi eklenmiştir. HMKnın atıf yapılan 161. maddesi hakime, bazı bilgiler hakkında gizli tutma kararı alma yetkisi vermektedir. Gizli bilgi ve belgelere ilişkin İYUKun 20. maddesi ve HMKnın 161. maddesi tarafların bilgi ve belgelere erişimini kısıtlayarak adil yargılanma hakkına müdahale etmektedir. Söz konusu düzenlemelerin belirsizliği ve gerekli güvenceleri içermemesi müdahalenin hukukiliğini tartışmalı hale getirmektedir.

Makale detayları

THE IMPACT OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTS IN ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE PROCEDURE

Yazarlar:

Miray Özhan

Yayıncı:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk ve Beşeri Bilimler | Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.29 Issue 1, pp.367-411

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

1/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001340243

pISSN:

2651-4141

Confidental information and documents

State secret

Right to fair Trial

İnquisition without preoccupation

Action for nullityGizli bilgi ve belge

Devlet sırrı

Adil yargılanma hakkı

Re'sen araştırma yetkisi

İptal davası

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Miray Özhan

Yayıncı: Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University

Ana Başlıklar: Hukuk ve Beşeri Bilimler | Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi: Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.29 Issue 1, pp.367-411

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 1/2025

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001340243

pISSN: 2651-4141

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Miray Özhan

Yayıncı:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk ve Beşeri Bilimler | Hukuk (Diğer)

Dergi:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.29 Issue 1, pp.367-411

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

1/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001340243

pISSN:

2651-4141