Evaluation of the Problems Arising in the Plunder Crime’s Qualified Version That Commited With aim of Collecting a Receivable Based  on a Legal Relationship With the Example of the Criminal Chamber  of the Court Judgement

Özlem Çelik Başbozkurt

Makale detayları

Evaluation of the Problems Arising in the Plunder Crime’s Qualified Version That Commited With aim of Collecting a Receivable Based on a Legal Relationship With the Example of the Criminal Chamber of the Court Judgement

Yazarlar:

Özlem Çelik Başbozkurt

Yayıncı:

Erciyes University

Ana Başlıklar:

Ceza Hukuku

Dergi:

Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.20 Issue 1, pp.497-539

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001345793

pISSN:

1306-3839

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Article 1501 of the Turkish Penal Code regulates that the perpetrator who threatens andor uses threats andor comupusion in order to collect hisher debt based on a legal relationship shall be punished for the offence of threat andor intentional bodily harm. The regula-tion is a condition that reduces the punishment due to the relations-hip between the perpetrator and the victim. In the event that a person who does not have a debt relationship with the debt perpetrator par-ticipates as a joint perpetrator, it becomes controversial with the existing jurisprudence of the Court of Cassation whether this qualified state will be applied to him. Likewise, if the offence of threatening is committed against more than one victim at the same time for the purpose of collecting the receivable, the aggregations problem arises. Similarly, while the provisions for consecutive crimes cannot be app-lied to the crime of plunder, which is the basic form of the crime, the-re is no obstacle to the crime of threat. So, it is necessary to determi-ne how to punish. In the review of judgement, the case that is the sub-ject of the courts decision will be evaluated and suggestions will be tried to be put forward.

 Article 1501 of the Turkish Penal Code regulates that the perpetrator who threatens andor uses threats andor comupusion in order to collect hisher debt based on a legal relationship shall be punished for the offence of threat andor intentional bodily harm. The regula-tion is a condition that reduces the punishment due to the relations-hip between the perpetrator and the victim. In the event that a person who does not have a debt relationship with the debt perpetrator par-ticipates as a joint perpetrator, it becomes controversial with the existing jurisprudence of the Court of Cassation whether this qualified state will be applied to him. Likewise, if the offence of threatening is committed against more than one victim at the same time for the purpose of collecting the receivable, the aggregations problem arises. Similarly, while the provisions for consecutive crimes cannot be app-lied to the crime of plunder, which is the basic form of the crime, the-re is no obstacle to the crime of threat. So, it is necessary to determi-ne how to punish. In the review of judgement, the case that is the sub-ject of the courts decision will be evaluated and suggestions will be tried to be put forward.

 Article 1501 of the Turkish Penal Code regulates that the perpetrator who threatens andor uses threats andor comupusion in order to collect hisher debt based on a legal relationship shall be punished for the offence of threat andor intentional bodily harm. The regula-tion is a condition that reduces the punishment due to the relations-hip between the perpetrator and the victim. In the event that a person who does not have a debt relationship with the debt perpetrator par-ticipates as a joint perpetrator, it becomes controversial with the existing jurisprudence of the Court of Cassation whether this qualified state will be applied to him. Likewise, if the offence of threatening is committed against more than one victim at the same time for the purpose of collecting the receivable, the aggregations problem arises. Similarly, while the provisions for consecutive crimes cannot be app-lied to the crime of plunder, which is the basic form of the crime, the-re is no obstacle to the crime of threat. So, it is necessary to determi-ne how to punish. In the review of judgement, the case that is the sub-ject of the courts decision will be evaluated and suggestions will be tried to be put forward.

 Türk Ceza Kanunu m. 1501de hukuki ilişkiye dayanan alacağını tahsil etme amacıyla tehdit veveya cebir kullanan failin yağma su-çundan değil tehdit veveya kasten yaralama suçlarından cezalandırı-lacağı düzenleme altına alınmıştır. Bu hüküm fail ile mağdur arasında var olan ilişkiden kaynaklı cezayı azaltıcı bir nitelikli hâldir. Alacaklı olan kişinin yanında, borç ilişkisi bulunmayan bir kişinin müşterek fail sıfatıyla fiile iştirak etmesi halinde bu nitelikli hâlin alacaklı ol-mayan kişiye uygulanıp uygulanmayacağı Yargıtayın mevcut içtihat-ları ile tartışmalı hale gelmektedir. Aynı şekilde birden fazla mağdura karşı alacağı tahsil amacıyla aynı anda tehdit suçunun işlenmesi ha-linde de içtimaa ilişkin sorun ortaya çıkmaktadır. Keza suçun temel şekli olan yağma suçunda zincirleme suç hükümleri uygulanamaya-cakken, tehdit suçunda zincirleme suç hükümleri uygulanabilecektir. Bu durumda ne şekilde cezalandırma yapılacağının belirlenmesi ge-rekmektedir. Yapılan karar incelemesinde mahkemelerin verdiği ka-rara konu olaya ilişkin bu hususlar başta olmak üzere hukuki değer-lendirmeler yapılacak, öneriler ortaya konulmaya çalışılacaktır.

Makale detayları

Evaluation of the Problems Arising in the Plunder Crime’s Qualified Version That Commited With aim of Collecting a Receivable Based on a Legal Relationship With the Example of the Criminal Chamber of the Court Judgement

Yazarlar:

Özlem Çelik Başbozkurt

Yayıncı:

Erciyes University

Ana Başlıklar:

Ceza Hukuku

Dergi:

Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.20 Issue 1, pp.497-539

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001345793

pISSN:

1306-3839

Plundering Committed With The Aim Of Collecting The Receivable Base On Legal Relationship

Effect Of Qualified Versions Of Offences on Joint Participation

Successive Offences

Deprivation of LibertyBir Hukuki İlişkiye Dayanan Alacağın Tahsili Amacıyla Yağma

Müş-terek Faillerde Nitelikli Hâlin Sirayeti

Zincirleme Suç

Kişi Hürriye-tinden Yoksun Kılma Suçu

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Özlem Çelik Başbozkurt

Yayıncı: Erciyes University

Ana Başlıklar: Ceza Hukuku

Dergi: Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.20 Issue 1, pp.497-539

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 4/2025

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001345793

pISSN: 1306-3839

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Özlem Çelik Başbozkurt

Yayıncı:

Erciyes University

Ana Başlıklar:

Ceza Hukuku

Dergi:

Erciyes Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.20 Issue 1, pp.497-539

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

4/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001345793

pISSN:

1306-3839