In the Hashiya Of Dede Ömer Rusenı on Baydawi Qira’at and Linguistic Explanations

Azime Kelleci

Makale detayları

In the Hashiya Of Dede Ömer Rusenı on Baydawi Qira’at and Linguistic Explanations

Yazarlar:

Azime Kelleci

Yayıncı:

Karabuk University

Ana Başlıklar:

Kuran-ı Kerim Okuma ve Kıraat

Dergi:

MUTALAA Vol.4 Issue 1, pp.29-44

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001337911

pISSN:

2791-8025

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Abstract Subject and Purpose: This study aims to examine the aspects related to the science of qiraat and linguistic explanations found in the hashiya authored by Dede Omer Ruseni on Qadi al-Baydawis Anwār al-Tanzīl wa-Asrār al-Tawīl commentary. Specifically, the study seeks to evaluate the depth of Rûşenîs mastery over the fields of qiraat and linguistic analysis, as well as the significance of his contributions to the discipline of tafsir. By analyzing the supplementary explanations and knowledge he added to al-Baydawis exegesis, the research sheds light on the academic value of his work. Within this context, the primary objective of this study is to underscore the importance of the qiraat and linguistic clarifications in the gloss from the perspective of tafsir and Quranic sciences, thereby making Rûşenîs contributions to the field of Quranic exegesis more accessible and appreciable. Method: This article was written based on a review of the literature and an examination of Rusenis hashiya. The study relies primarily on the manuscript preserved in the Süleymaniye Manuscript Library, cataloged under Yeni Medrese 175524. Throughout the research, the qiraat and linguistic explanations were identified, categorized, and subsequently analyzed based on the extracted data. This approach enabled the determination of the central themes within the qiraat and linguistic explanations. Additionally, Rusenis interpretations were compared with Baydawis views, facilitating an evaluation of Rusenis contributions to the field. Results: The findings of the study reveal several significant aspects of Rusenis approach to qiraat and linguistic analysis. From the perspective of qiraat, it is evident that Ruseni placed great emphasis on identifying the sources of recitation variants, often prioritizing the narrations of prominent qiraat scholars such as Ibn Kathir, Abu Amr, Hamzah, and Kisai. Additionally, his detailed explanations of tajweed rules, including the articulation points and characteristics of letters, as well as the rulings on waqf and wasl, are noteworthy. His analysis of the saba ahruf also underscores his effort to elucidate the permissibility of reading certain verses in different dialects. Moreover, his focus on the aesthetic aspects of Quranic recitation, including the use of beautiful vocalization and taghanni, highlights the importance he placed on the auditory dimension of qiraat. From a linguistic perspective, the study found that Ruseni delved deeply into grammar rules, etymology, lexical variations, and dialectical differences. He explored the roots and derivations of words, the influence of morphological patterns on meaning, and the subtle distinctions between the lexical and terminological meanings of words, enriching his explanations with these nuanced insights. Regarding his contributions to the discipline of tafsir, it can be stated that Rusenis detailed discussions on qiraat variants and his frequent references to qiraat authorities make his gloss a valuable resource. His systematic and scholarly approach ensures that the gloss can serve as a reliable source for understanding qiraat and its integration into the broader field of Quranic exegesis Conclusions: The work, composed as a hashiya on Baydawis tafsir, holds a significant position in the literature due to its focus on qiraat and linguistic explanations. Therefore, from the perspective of qiraat studies, it can also be considered a remarkable example of the Ottoman tafsir tradition. This is because Ruseni, in addressing qiraat variants, provided profound interpretations of Baydawis commentary by drawing upon the insights of qiraat scholars. Furthermore, through his linguistic analyses grounded in the Arabic language, Ruseni contributed significantly to the understanding of both the Quranic verses and Baydawis explanations.

 Abstract Subject and Purpose: This study aims to examine the aspects related to the science of qiraat and linguistic explanations found in the hashiya authored by Dede Omer Ruseni on Qadi al-Baydawis Anwār al-Tanzīl wa-Asrār al-Tawīl commentary. Specifically, the study seeks to evaluate the depth of Rûşenîs mastery over the fields of qiraat and linguistic analysis, as well as the significance of his contributions to the discipline of tafsir. By analyzing the supplementary explanations and knowledge he added to al-Baydawis exegesis, the research sheds light on the academic value of his work. Within this context, the primary objective of this study is to underscore the importance of the qiraat and linguistic clarifications in the gloss from the perspective of tafsir and Quranic sciences, thereby making Rûşenîs contributions to the field of Quranic exegesis more accessible and appreciable. Method: This article was written based on a review of the literature and an examination of Rusenis hashiya. The study relies primarily on the manuscript preserved in the Süleymaniye Manuscript Library, cataloged under Yeni Medrese 175524. Throughout the research, the qiraat and linguistic explanations were identified, categorized, and subsequently analyzed based on the extracted data. This approach enabled the determination of the central themes within the qiraat and linguistic explanations. Additionally, Rusenis interpretations were compared with Baydawis views, facilitating an evaluation of Rusenis contributions to the field. Results: The findings of the study reveal several significant aspects of Rusenis approach to qiraat and linguistic analysis. From the perspective of qiraat, it is evident that Ruseni placed great emphasis on identifying the sources of recitation variants, often prioritizing the narrations of prominent qiraat scholars such as Ibn Kathir, Abu Amr, Hamzah, and Kisai. Additionally, his detailed explanations of tajweed rules, including the articulation points and characteristics of letters, as well as the rulings on waqf and wasl, are noteworthy. His analysis of the saba ahruf also underscores his effort to elucidate the permissibility of reading certain verses in different dialects. Moreover, his focus on the aesthetic aspects of Quranic recitation, including the use of beautiful vocalization and taghanni, highlights the importance he placed on the auditory dimension of qiraat. From a linguistic perspective, the study found that Ruseni delved deeply into grammar rules, etymology, lexical variations, and dialectical differences. He explored the roots and derivations of words, the influence of morphological patterns on meaning, and the subtle distinctions between the lexical and terminological meanings of words, enriching his explanations with these nuanced insights. Regarding his contributions to the discipline of tafsir, it can be stated that Rusenis detailed discussions on qiraat variants and his frequent references to qiraat authorities make his gloss a valuable resource. His systematic and scholarly approach ensures that the gloss can serve as a reliable source for understanding qiraat and its integration into the broader field of Quranic exegesis Conclusions: The work, composed as a hashiya on Baydawis tafsir, holds a significant position in the literature due to its focus on qiraat and linguistic explanations. Therefore, from the perspective of qiraat studies, it can also be considered a remarkable example of the Ottoman tafsir tradition. This is because Ruseni, in addressing qiraat variants, provided profound interpretations of Baydawis commentary by drawing upon the insights of qiraat scholars. Furthermore, through his linguistic analyses grounded in the Arabic language, Ruseni contributed significantly to the understanding of both the Quranic verses and Baydawis explanations.

 Abstract Subject and Purpose: This study aims to examine the aspects related to the science of qiraat and linguistic explanations found in the hashiya authored by Dede Omer Ruseni on Qadi al-Baydawis Anwār al-Tanzīl wa-Asrār al-Tawīl commentary. Specifically, the study seeks to evaluate the depth of Rûşenîs mastery over the fields of qiraat and linguistic analysis, as well as the significance of his contributions to the discipline of tafsir. By analyzing the supplementary explanations and knowledge he added to al-Baydawis exegesis, the research sheds light on the academic value of his work. Within this context, the primary objective of this study is to underscore the importance of the qiraat and linguistic clarifications in the gloss from the perspective of tafsir and Quranic sciences, thereby making Rûşenîs contributions to the field of Quranic exegesis more accessible and appreciable. Method: This article was written based on a review of the literature and an examination of Rusenis hashiya. The study relies primarily on the manuscript preserved in the Süleymaniye Manuscript Library, cataloged under Yeni Medrese 175524. Throughout the research, the qiraat and linguistic explanations were identified, categorized, and subsequently analyzed based on the extracted data. This approach enabled the determination of the central themes within the qiraat and linguistic explanations. Additionally, Rusenis interpretations were compared with Baydawis views, facilitating an evaluation of Rusenis contributions to the field. Results: The findings of the study reveal several significant aspects of Rusenis approach to qiraat and linguistic analysis. From the perspective of qiraat, it is evident that Ruseni placed great emphasis on identifying the sources of recitation variants, often prioritizing the narrations of prominent qiraat scholars such as Ibn Kathir, Abu Amr, Hamzah, and Kisai. Additionally, his detailed explanations of tajweed rules, including the articulation points and characteristics of letters, as well as the rulings on waqf and wasl, are noteworthy. His analysis of the saba ahruf also underscores his effort to elucidate the permissibility of reading certain verses in different dialects. Moreover, his focus on the aesthetic aspects of Quranic recitation, including the use of beautiful vocalization and taghanni, highlights the importance he placed on the auditory dimension of qiraat. From a linguistic perspective, the study found that Ruseni delved deeply into grammar rules, etymology, lexical variations, and dialectical differences. He explored the roots and derivations of words, the influence of morphological patterns on meaning, and the subtle distinctions between the lexical and terminological meanings of words, enriching his explanations with these nuanced insights. Regarding his contributions to the discipline of tafsir, it can be stated that Rusenis detailed discussions on qiraat variants and his frequent references to qiraat authorities make his gloss a valuable resource. His systematic and scholarly approach ensures that the gloss can serve as a reliable source for understanding qiraat and its integration into the broader field of Quranic exegesis Conclusions: The work, composed as a hashiya on Baydawis tafsir, holds a significant position in the literature due to its focus on qiraat and linguistic explanations. Therefore, from the perspective of qiraat studies, it can also be considered a remarkable example of the Ottoman tafsir tradition. This is because Ruseni, in addressing qiraat variants, provided profound interpretations of Baydawis commentary by drawing upon the insights of qiraat scholars. Furthermore, through his linguistic analyses grounded in the Arabic language, Ruseni contributed significantly to the understanding of both the Quranic verses and Baydawis explanations.

 Öz Konu ve Amaç: Bu çalışmada, Dede Ömer Rûşenînin Kâdî Beydâvînin Envârut-tenzîl ve esrârut-tevîl adlı tefsirine yazdığı hâşiyesinde yer alan kıraat ilmine ve dilbilimsel açıklamalara yönelik hususların ortaya konulması hedeflenmektedir. Dolayısıyla Rûşenînin kıraat ilmi ve dilsel açıklamalar özelinde Beydâvî tefsirine ilaveten getirdiği açıklamaları ve bilgi aktarımlarının, alana ne derece hâkim olduğunun ve tefsir ilmine sunduğu katkılarının ne derece önem arz ettiğinin değerlendirilmesine olanak sağlamaktadır. Bu bağlamda çalışmamızın temel amacı, haşiyedeki kıraat ve dilbilimsel açıklamaların tefsir ve Kurân ilimleri açısından önemini vurgulamak ve bu sayede Rûşenînin tefsir ilmine katkılarını istifadeye sunmaktır. Yöntem: Bu makale, literatür taranarak ile Rûşenînin hâşiyesi incelenerek kaleme alınmıştır. İlgili çalışmada Rûşenînin Süleymaniye Yazma Eserler Kütüphanesi Yeni Medresede 175524 numarayla kayıtlı nüsha temele alınmıştır. Çalışma boyunca kıraat ve dilsel açıklamalar tespit edilerek tasnifi yapılmış, sonrasında verilerden hareketle analiz edilmiştir. Böylece kıraat ve dilbilimsel açıklamaların ekseni tespit edilmiş, Rûşenînin izahlarıyla Beydâvînin görüşleri karşılaştırılmak suretiyle Rûşenînin alana katkıları incelenmiştir. Bulgular: Çalışma kapsamında elde edilen bulgular kıraat açısından değerlendirildiğinde Rûşenînin kıraata dair vecihlerin kaynağını göstermeye önem verdiği, kıraat farklılıklarına değinirken İbn Kesîr, Ebû Amr, Hamza ve Kisâî gibi kıraat âlimlerinin rivayetlerini ön planda tuttuğu görülmüştür. Öte yandan tecvid kurallarını, harflerin mahreç ve sıfatlarıyla vakıf ve vasla dair hükümleri açıkladığı tespit edilmiştir. Yedi harf konusundaki görüşleri değerlendirerek ayetlerin farklı lehçelerde okunabileceğine dair izahatlar yaptığı görülmüştür. Diğer taraftan Kurânı Kerimin okunuşunda sesin güzelliğinden yararlanılmasına yönelik izahları, kıraat ilminde teğannî ve sese önem verdiğini göstermektedir. Çalışmanın dilsel açıdan katkıları bağlamında dilbilgisi kuralları, kelime kökleri, sözlük ve lehçe farklılıkları üzerinde durulduğu; kelimelerin iştikakı ile vezinlerin anlama etkisi; kelimelerin lügat ve terim manaları arasındaki ince farkların ortaya koyularak izahların zenginleştirildiği görülmüştür. Tefsir ilmine katkısı bağlamında kıraat vecihlerine dair bilgiler sunulduğu ve kıraat imamlarına başvurulması sebebiyle hâşiyenin kaynak olarak değerlendirilebileceği söylenebilir. Sonuç: Beydâvî tefsirine hâşiye olarak kaleme alınan eserin, kıraat ve dilbilimsel izahlar yönüyle literatürde önemli bir yere sahip olduğu görülmektedir. Bundan dolayı kıraat ilmi açısından ele alındığında Osmanlı tefsir geleneğinin güzel bir örneği olarak da değerlendirilebilir. Zira Rûşenî, kıraat vecihlerini ele aldığı yerlerde kıraat imamlarından hareket ederek Beydâvî tefsirinin açıklamasında derinliğe sahip yorumlar yapmıştır. Öte yandan Arap diline dayalı yaptığı izahlar da hem ayetlerin hem de Beydâvînin anlaşılmasında katkı sunmuştur.

Makale detayları

In the Hashiya Of Dede Ömer Rusenı on Baydawi Qira’at and Linguistic Explanations

Yazarlar:

Azime Kelleci

Yayıncı:

Karabuk University

Ana Başlıklar:

Kuran-ı Kerim Okuma ve Kıraat

Dergi:

MUTALAA Vol.4 Issue 1, pp.29-44

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001337911

pISSN:

2791-8025

Qira’at

Tafsir

Baydawi’s Tafsir

Dede Omer Ruşenı

HashiyaKıraat

Tefsir

Beydâvî Tefsiri

Hâşiye

Dede Ömer Rûşenî

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Azime Kelleci

Yayıncı: Karabuk University

Ana Başlıklar: Kuran-ı Kerim Okuma ve Kıraat

Dergi: MUTALAA Vol.4 Issue 1, pp.29-44

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 12/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001337911

pISSN: 2791-8025

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Azime Kelleci

Yayıncı:

Karabuk University

Ana Başlıklar:

Kuran-ı Kerim Okuma ve Kıraat

Dergi:

MUTALAA Vol.4 Issue 1, pp.29-44

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001337911

pISSN:

2791-8025