AN EVALUATION ON WHETHER THE DRAWER HAS THE RIGHT TO ACTION FOR ANNULMENT IN THE EVENT OF LOSS OF A CHEQUE

Muhammet Emin Bingöl

Makale detayları

AN EVALUATION ON WHETHER THE DRAWER HAS THE RIGHT TO ACTION FOR ANNULMENT IN THE EVENT OF LOSS OF A CHEQUE

Yazarlar:

Muhammet Emin Bingöl

Yayıncı:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk

Dergi:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.28 Issue 1, pp.73-100

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001311588

pISSN:

2651-4141

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 In this article on whether the drawer may file an action for annulment in the event of the loss of a cheque, the approaches in the doctrine and the decisions of the Court of Cassation regarding the drawers filing of an action for annulment are primarily included. In addition, the views on the subject in comparative law are also mentioned. After evaluating that the opinions on both sides of the issue are open to criticism, the issue is analyzed in terms of the existing law, and as a result, it is concluded that there are positive regulations for the drawer to file an action for annulment under the existing law. Therefore, the Court of Cassations jurisprudence to the contrary is considered to be inappropriate. On the other hand, in order to ensure legal certainty for the drawer, it is considered that it would be beneficial to change the expression holder of the right on the bill in paragraph 2 of Article 651 of the TCC in accordance with the provisions regarding the bill, or to explicitly regulate in the relevant provisions of the bill that the drawer may also file an action for annulment.

 In this article on whether the drawer may file an action for annulment in the event of the loss of a cheque, the approaches in the doctrine and the decisions of the Court of Cassation regarding the drawers filing of an action for annulment are primarily included. In addition, the views on the subject in comparative law are also mentioned. After evaluating that the opinions on both sides of the issue are open to criticism, the issue is analyzed in terms of the existing law, and as a result, it is concluded that there are positive regulations for the drawer to file an action for annulment under the existing law. Therefore, the Court of Cassations jurisprudence to the contrary is considered to be inappropriate. On the other hand, in order to ensure legal certainty for the drawer, it is considered that it would be beneficial to change the expression holder of the right on the bill in paragraph 2 of Article 651 of the TCC in accordance with the provisions regarding the bill, or to explicitly regulate in the relevant provisions of the bill that the drawer may also file an action for annulment.

 In this article on whether the drawer may file an action for annulment in the event of the loss of a cheque, the approaches in the doctrine and the decisions of the Court of Cassation regarding the drawers filing of an action for annulment are primarily included. In addition, the views on the subject in comparative law are also mentioned. After evaluating that the opinions on both sides of the issue are open to criticism, the issue is analyzed in terms of the existing law, and as a result, it is concluded that there are positive regulations for the drawer to file an action for annulment under the existing law. Therefore, the Court of Cassations jurisprudence to the contrary is considered to be inappropriate. On the other hand, in order to ensure legal certainty for the drawer, it is considered that it would be beneficial to change the expression holder of the right on the bill in paragraph 2 of Article 651 of the TCC in accordance with the provisions regarding the bill, or to explicitly regulate in the relevant provisions of the bill that the drawer may also file an action for annulment.

 Çekin zayi olması hâlinde düzenleyen tarafından iptal davası açılıp açılamayacağına ilişkin olan bu makalede, öncelikli olarak düzenleyenin iptal davası açmasına yönelik doktrindeki görüşlere ve Yargıtay içtihatlarına yer verilmiştir. Buna ek olarak konuya ilişkin mukayeseli hukuktaki görüşlere de değinilmiştir. Meseleye dair her iki yöndeki görüşlerin de eleştiriye açık yanlarının bulunduğu değerlendirildikten sonra, konu mevcut hukuk bakımından ele alınmış ve bunun sonucu olarak mevcut hukuk bakımından düzenleyenin iptal davası açabilmesine yönelik pozitif düzenlemelerin var olduğu kanaatine ulaşılmıştır. Dolayısıyla Yargıtayın aksi yöndeki içtihatlarının yerinde olmadığı değerlendirilmiştir. Bununla birlikte düzenleyen bakımından hukukî belirliliğin sağlanması adına TTKnın 651. maddesinin 2. fıkrasında yer alan senet üzerindeki hak sahibi ifadesinin, poliçeye ilişkin hükümlere uygun bir şekilde değiştirilmesi ya da poliçenin ilgili hükümlerinde düzenleyenin de iptal davası açabileceğinin açık bir şekilde düzenlenmesinin yararlı olacağı sonucuna varılmıştır.

Makale detayları

AN EVALUATION ON WHETHER THE DRAWER HAS THE RIGHT TO ACTION FOR ANNULMENT IN THE EVENT OF LOSS OF A CHEQUE

Yazarlar:

Muhammet Emin Bingöl

Yayıncı:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk

Dergi:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.28 Issue 1, pp.73-100

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001311588

pISSN:

2651-4141

Negotiable instruments

cheque

action for annulment

drawer

loss of chequeKıymetli evrak

çek

iptal davası

düzenleyen

zayi olma

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Muhammet Emin Bingöl

Yayıncı: Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University

Ana Başlıklar: Hukuk

Dergi: Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.28 Issue 1, pp.73-100

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 6/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001311588

pISSN: 2651-4141

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Muhammet Emin Bingöl

Yayıncı:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University

Ana Başlıklar:

Hukuk

Dergi:

Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.28 Issue 1, pp.73-100

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001311588

pISSN:

2651-4141