The Crime of Rebellion and Combating Rebels: A Comparative Study on The Axis of Ottoman Period Figh Sources

Şükrü Şahin Dügencili; Abdurrahman Haçkalı

Makale detayları

The Crime of Rebellion and Combating Rebels: A Comparative Study on The Axis of Ottoman Period Figh Sources

Yazarlar:

Şükrü Şahin Dügencili | Abdurrahman Haçkalı

Yayıncı:

Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University

Ana Başlıklar:

İslam Hukuku

Dergi:

Tokat İlmiyat Dergisi Vol.13 Issue 1, pp.63-89

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001351904

pISSN:

2717-610X

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 This study comparatively examines the treatment of rebellion in some major Ottoman period fiqh works Jāmiʿal-fuṣūlayn, al-Tashīl sharḥ Laṭāʾif al-ishārāt, Mushtamil al-aḥkām, Durar al-ḥukkām sharḥ Gurar al-aḥkām, al-Īḍāḥ wal-Iṣlāḥ, Multaqā al-abḥur, Tanwīr al-abṣār wa jāmiʿal-biḥār, Musʿifat al-ḥukkām ʿalā al-aḥkām, Minaḥ al-ghaffār, al-Durr al-mukhtār, Majmaʿ al-anhur, al-Durr al-muntaqā and Radd al-muḥtār. These works were selected based on several factors: they were written during different Ottoman Empire periods; the reputation of both the works and their authors; some being accepted as legal codes and reference sources in their period, along with their subsequent influence and esteem. This study aims to reveal similarities and differences through a comparative examination of rebellion sections in works produced under Ottoman sovereignty. Additionally, it aims to address the topic of rebellion from a different approach by dividing the rebel combat process into pre-armed conflict, armed conflict phase and post-armed conflict stages. These two aims are expected to contribute to the reflection of the periods legal perspective into the present day and understanding the developmental process of rebellion. The study uses a comparative analysis method and consists of two main sections besides the introduction and conclusion. The first section initially addresses how the topic of rebellion was generally included in pre-Ottoman Ḥanafī fiqh, followed by definitions of rebellion in Ottoman-period Ḥanafī fiqh works and the conditions derived from these definitions. The second section presents the process of combat rebels by classifying it into pre-armed conflict, armed conflict phase, and post-armed conflict stages and making comparisons between works. Through comparison, while narratives about rebellion in text and text-like works largely overlap, partial differences were also identified.

 This study comparatively examines the treatment of rebellion in some major Ottoman period fiqh works Jāmiʿal-fuṣūlayn, al-Tashīl sharḥ Laṭāʾif al-ishārāt, Mushtamil al-aḥkām, Durar al-ḥukkām sharḥ Gurar al-aḥkām, al-Īḍāḥ wal-Iṣlāḥ, Multaqā al-abḥur, Tanwīr al-abṣār wa jāmiʿal-biḥār, Musʿifat al-ḥukkām ʿalā al-aḥkām, Minaḥ al-ghaffār, al-Durr al-mukhtār, Majmaʿ al-anhur, al-Durr al-muntaqā and Radd al-muḥtār. These works were selected based on several factors: they were written during different Ottoman Empire periods; the reputation of both the works and their authors; some being accepted as legal codes and reference sources in their period, along with their subsequent influence and esteem. This study aims to reveal similarities and differences through a comparative examination of rebellion sections in works produced under Ottoman sovereignty. Additionally, it aims to address the topic of rebellion from a different approach by dividing the rebel combat process into pre-armed conflict, armed conflict phase and post-armed conflict stages. These two aims are expected to contribute to the reflection of the periods legal perspective into the present day and understanding the developmental process of rebellion. The study uses a comparative analysis method and consists of two main sections besides the introduction and conclusion. The first section initially addresses how the topic of rebellion was generally included in pre-Ottoman Ḥanafī fiqh, followed by definitions of rebellion in Ottoman-period Ḥanafī fiqh works and the conditions derived from these definitions. The second section presents the process of combat rebels by classifying it into pre-armed conflict, armed conflict phase, and post-armed conflict stages and making comparisons between works. Through comparison, while narratives about rebellion in text and text-like works largely overlap, partial differences were also identified.

 This study comparatively examines the treatment of rebellion in some major Ottoman period fiqh works Jāmiʿal-fuṣūlayn, al-Tashīl sharḥ Laṭāʾif al-ishārāt, Mushtamil al-aḥkām, Durar al-ḥukkām sharḥ Gurar al-aḥkām, al-Īḍāḥ wal-Iṣlāḥ, Multaqā al-abḥur, Tanwīr al-abṣār wa jāmiʿal-biḥār, Musʿifat al-ḥukkām ʿalā al-aḥkām, Minaḥ al-ghaffār, al-Durr al-mukhtār, Majmaʿ al-anhur, al-Durr al-muntaqā and Radd al-muḥtār. These works were selected based on several factors: they were written during different Ottoman Empire periods; the reputation of both the works and their authors; some being accepted as legal codes and reference sources in their period, along with their subsequent influence and esteem. This study aims to reveal similarities and differences through a comparative examination of rebellion sections in works produced under Ottoman sovereignty. Additionally, it aims to address the topic of rebellion from a different approach by dividing the rebel combat process into pre-armed conflict, armed conflict phase and post-armed conflict stages. These two aims are expected to contribute to the reflection of the periods legal perspective into the present day and understanding the developmental process of rebellion. The study uses a comparative analysis method and consists of two main sections besides the introduction and conclusion. The first section initially addresses how the topic of rebellion was generally included in pre-Ottoman Ḥanafī fiqh, followed by definitions of rebellion in Ottoman-period Ḥanafī fiqh works and the conditions derived from these definitions. The second section presents the process of combat rebels by classifying it into pre-armed conflict, armed conflict phase, and post-armed conflict stages and making comparisons between works. Through comparison, while narratives about rebellion in text and text-like works largely overlap, partial differences were also identified.

 Bu çalışma, Osmanlı dönemine ait Câmiul-fusûleyn, et-Teshîl şerhu Letâifil-işârât, Müştemilül-ahkâm, Dürerül-hükkâm şerhu Gureril-ahkâm, Îzâhul-Islâh, Mülteḳal-ebḥur, Tenvîrül-ebsâr ve câmiul-biḥâr, Müsifetül-ḥükkâm alel-aḥkâm, Minehul-gaffâr, ed-Dürrül-muhtâr, Mecmaul-enhur, ed-Dürrül-müntekâ ve Reddül-muhtâr isimli klasik fıkıh eserlerinde bağy konusunun işlenişinin mukayeseli bir şekilde incelenmesini konu edinmektedir. Osmanlı döneminin farklı zaman dilimlerinde kaleme alınmış olmaları, aynı zamanda gerek eserlerin gerekse de müelliflerinin şöhreti, bir kısmının dönemlerinde hukuk kodu ve başvuru kaynağı olarak kabul edilmesi, ayrıca sonraki dönemlerde gördükleri ilgi ve itibar, mezkûr eserlerin çalışma konusu olarak tercih edilmesinde belirleyici unsur olmuştur. Çalışmanın amacı, aynı devletin egemenliği altında ve farklı zaman dilimlerinde üretilen fıkıh eserlerinin bağy bölümünün, mukayeseli bir şekilde incelenerek benzeşen ve farklılık arz eden yönlerin ortaya çıkarılmasıdır. İlaveten bâğîlerle mücadele sürecinin silahlı mücadele öncesi, silahlı mücadele aşaması ve silahlı mücadele sonrası şeklinde somutlaştırılarak, bağy konusunun farklı bir yaklaşımla ele alınmasıdır. Bu iki temel amacın temini neticesinde elde edilen tablonun, dönemin hukuki görünümünün günümüze yansımasına, ayrıca bağyin gelişim sürecinin anlaşılmasına katkı sunacağı düşünülmektedir. Çalışmada bu amaç doğrultusunda, karşılaştırmalı analiz yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Çalışma giriş ve sonuç dışında iki bölümden oluşmaktadır. Birinci bölümde ilk olarak, bağy konusunun Osmanlı öncesi Hanefî fıkhında -genel olarak- nasıl yer aldığına temas edilmiş, sonrasında ise Osmanlı döneminde kaleme alınmış olan Hanefî mezhebi eksenli fıkıh eserlerinde bağye dair tanımlar ile tanımlardan elde edilen şartlara yer verilmiştir. İkinci bölümde bâğîlerle mücadele süreci silahlı mücadele öncesi, silahlı mücadele aşaması ve silahlı mücadele sonrası şeklinde tasnif edilmiş ve konu mukayeseli olarak incelenmeye çalışılmıştır. Mukayese neticesinde metin türü ve metin ile şerhin iç içe geçtiği değerlendirilen muhtasar şerh türü metin nitelikli eserlerde bağye dair anlatımların büyük ölçüde örtüştüğü görülmekle birlikte, kısmî farklılıklar da tespit edilmiştir. Şerh ve hâşiye türü eserlerde ise ilgili konulara dair detaylı açıklamalar yapıldığı müşahede edilmiştir.

Makale detayları

The Crime of Rebellion and Combating Rebels: A Comparative Study on The Axis of Ottoman Period Figh Sources

Yazarlar:

Şükrü Şahin Dügencili | Abdurrahman Haçkalı

Yayıncı:

Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University

Ana Başlıklar:

İslam Hukuku

Dergi:

Tokat İlmiyat Dergisi Vol.13 Issue 1, pp.63-89

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001351904

pISSN:

2717-610X

Islamic Jurisprudence (fiqh)

Rebellion (baghy)

Ottoman Period

Insurgency

Comparative Analysis.İslam Hukuku

Bağy

Osmanlı Dönemi

İsyan

Mukayese.

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Şükrü Şahin Dügencili | Abdurrahman Haçkalı

Yayıncı: Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University

Ana Başlıklar: İslam Hukuku

Dergi: Tokat İlmiyat Dergisi Vol.13 Issue 1, pp.63-89

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 6/2025

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001351904

pISSN: 2717-610X

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Şükrü Şahin Dügencili | Abdurrahman Haçkalı

Yayıncı:

Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University

Ana Başlıklar:

İslam Hukuku

Dergi:

Tokat İlmiyat Dergisi Vol.13 Issue 1, pp.63-89

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001351904

pISSN:

2717-610X