IS THE CIVIL COURT FOR INTELLECTUAL AND INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY RIGHTS COMPETENT IN DISPUTES RELATED TO FINANCIAL RIGHTS INFRINGEMENTS ARISING FROM NFTIZED WORKS?

Seyhan Selçuk

Makale detayları

IS THE CIVIL COURT FOR INTELLECTUAL AND INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY RIGHTS COMPETENT IN DISPUTES RELATED TO FINANCIAL RIGHTS INFRINGEMENTS ARISING FROM NFTIZED WORKS?

Yazarlar:

Seyhan Selçuk

Yayıncı:

Selcuk University

Ana Başlıklar:

Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku | Sivil Prosedür

Dergi:

Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.32 Issue 2, pp.1157-1200

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001317185

pISSN:

1306-8075

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Although everything that can be digitized can be converted into NFT, the technology in question is more commonly referred to with concepts such as NFT Work, NFT Art, and NFT Artist. As a consequence of this, the question of whether the product converted into NFT will give rise to disputes arising from the Law on Intellectual and Artistic Works FSEK, and if so, whether the court in charge of financial rights violations arising from NFT works will be the civil court for intellectual and industrial property rights, should be also answered in terms of civil procedural law. As a result of the lack of a clear legal regulation on NFTs at the time of this study and the rapid advancement of technological developments due to the possibility of changes in the NFT creation process in the future, this study tries to make an assessment within the framework of various opinions possibilities that may be adopted in practice without making a definitive judgment regarding the jurisdiction of civil court for the intellectual and industrial property rights in disputes arising from NFTized works.

 Although everything that can be digitized can be converted into NFT, the technology in question is more commonly referred to with concepts such as NFT Work, NFT Art, and NFT Artist. As a consequence of this, the question of whether the product converted into NFT will give rise to disputes arising from the Law on Intellectual and Artistic Works FSEK, and if so, whether the court in charge of financial rights violations arising from NFT works will be the civil court for intellectual and industrial property rights, should be also answered in terms of civil procedural law. As a result of the lack of a clear legal regulation on NFTs at the time of this study and the rapid advancement of technological developments due to the possibility of changes in the NFT creation process in the future, this study tries to make an assessment within the framework of various opinions possibilities that may be adopted in practice without making a definitive judgment regarding the jurisdiction of civil court for the intellectual and industrial property rights in disputes arising from NFTized works.

 Although everything that can be digitized can be converted into NFT, the technology in question is more commonly referred to with concepts such as NFT Work, NFT Art, and NFT Artist. As a consequence of this, the question of whether the product converted into NFT will give rise to disputes arising from the Law on Intellectual and Artistic Works FSEK, and if so, whether the court in charge of financial rights violations arising from NFT works will be the civil court for intellectual and industrial property rights, should be also answered in terms of civil procedural law. As a result of the lack of a clear legal regulation on NFTs at the time of this study and the rapid advancement of technological developments due to the possibility of changes in the NFT creation process in the future, this study tries to make an assessment within the framework of various opinions possibilities that may be adopted in practice without making a definitive judgment regarding the jurisdiction of civil court for the intellectual and industrial property rights in disputes arising from NFTized works.

 Dijitalleştirilebilen her şey NFTye dönüştürülebilmekteyse de söz konusu teknoloji özellikle NFT Eseri, NFT Sanatı, NFT Sanatçısı gibi kavramlarla daha çok anılmaktadır. Bunun bir sonucu olarak NFT haline getirilen ürünün Fikir ve Sanat Eserleri Kanunundan FSEK kaynaklanan uyuşmazlıklara sebebiyet verip vermeyeceği ve verebilecekse NFT eserlerinden kaynaklanan mali hak ihlallerinde görevli mahkemenin fikri ve sınai haklar hukuk mahkemesi mi olacağı sorusuna, medeni usul hukuku açısından cevap verilmelidir. Bu çalışmanın yapıldığı esnada NFTlere ilişkin açık kanuni bir düzenlemenin yapılmamış olması ve teknolojik gelişmelerin hızlı bir şekilde ilerlemesinin bir sonucu olarak gelecekte NFT oluşturma işleminde yaşanabilecek değişikliklerin mümkün olması sebebiyle, bu çalışmada NFTleştirilmiş eserlerden kaynaklanan uyuşmazlıklarda fikri ve sınai haklar hukuk mahkemesinin göreviyle alakalı kesin bir yargıya varılmadan uygulamada benimsenebilecek çeşitli görüşler olasılıklar çerçevesinde bir değerlendirme yapılmaya çalışılmaktadır.

Makale detayları

IS THE CIVIL COURT FOR INTELLECTUAL AND INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY RIGHTS COMPETENT IN DISPUTES RELATED TO FINANCIAL RIGHTS INFRINGEMENTS ARISING FROM NFTIZED WORKS?

Yazarlar:

Seyhan Selçuk

Yayıncı:

Selcuk University

Ana Başlıklar:

Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku | Sivil Prosedür

Dergi:

Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.32 Issue 2, pp.1157-1200

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001317185

pISSN:

1306-8075

Blockchain

Smart Contract

Crypto-Assets

NFT

Civil Courts for Intellectual and Industrial Property RightsBlokzincir

Akıllı Sözleşme

Kripto Varlıklar

NFT

Fikri ve Sınai Haklar Hukuk Mahkemesi

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Seyhan Selçuk

Yayıncı: Selcuk University

Ana Başlıklar: Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku | Sivil Prosedür

Dergi: Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.32 Issue 2, pp.1157-1200

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 6/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001317185

pISSN: 1306-8075

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Seyhan Selçuk

Yayıncı:

Selcuk University

Ana Başlıklar:

Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku | Sivil Prosedür

Dergi:

Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.32 Issue 2, pp.1157-1200

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

6/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001317185

pISSN:

1306-8075