THE AUTHORITY TO DECIDE ON THE CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATION PROCEDURE AND THE PROBLEM OF LIMITATION OF THE RIGHT TO RESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY

Çiler Damla Bayraktar

Makale detayları

THE AUTHORITY TO DECIDE ON THE CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATION PROCEDURE AND THE PROBLEM OF LIMITATION OF THE RIGHT TO RESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY

Yazarlar:

Çiler Damla Bayraktar

Yayıncı:

Selcuk University

Ana Başlıklar:

Ceza Hukuku

Dergi:

Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.33 Issue 1, pp.207-238

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

3/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001343909

pISSN:

1306-8075

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Paragraph 92 of the Regulation on Forensic and Preventive Searches indirectly regulates which authority has the authority to decide on the crime scene investigation procedure by referring to paragraph 91 of the same article. When the relevant article is analyzed, it is concluded that crime scene investigation procedures in places other than public places, i.e. places closed to the public, shall be carried out upon the written order of the judge or the public prosecutor in cases of inconvenience in delay. At the legal level, the issue of who will give the order for crime scene investigation is regulated in additional Article 67 of the PVSK. Accordingly, the police shall, upon the order of the public prosecutor, carry out the necessary examinations and technical investigations at the crime scene in order to identify the evidence of the offence, identify the evidence, take it under custody and send it to the relevant places for examination. As can be seen, the aforementioned article of the law does not stipulate a special issue regarding the question of whether this authorization will be valid even if the crime scene constitutes an area closed to the public, contrary to the regulation. Likewise, there is no provision in the article regarding the fact that the crime scene is a place protected by the right to inviolability of residence. In this study, the issue of which authority will orderdecree the crime scene investigation in all these cases has been addressed with a new approach by considering Article 21 of the Constitution.

 Paragraph 92 of the Regulation on Forensic and Preventive Searches indirectly regulates which authority has the authority to decide on the crime scene investigation procedure by referring to paragraph 91 of the same article. When the relevant article is analyzed, it is concluded that crime scene investigation procedures in places other than public places, i.e. places closed to the public, shall be carried out upon the written order of the judge or the public prosecutor in cases of inconvenience in delay. At the legal level, the issue of who will give the order for crime scene investigation is regulated in additional Article 67 of the PVSK. Accordingly, the police shall, upon the order of the public prosecutor, carry out the necessary examinations and technical investigations at the crime scene in order to identify the evidence of the offence, identify the evidence, take it under custody and send it to the relevant places for examination. As can be seen, the aforementioned article of the law does not stipulate a special issue regarding the question of whether this authorization will be valid even if the crime scene constitutes an area closed to the public, contrary to the regulation. Likewise, there is no provision in the article regarding the fact that the crime scene is a place protected by the right to inviolability of residence. In this study, the issue of which authority will orderdecree the crime scene investigation in all these cases has been addressed with a new approach by considering Article 21 of the Constitution.

 Paragraph 92 of the Regulation on Forensic and Preventive Searches indirectly regulates which authority has the authority to decide on the crime scene investigation procedure by referring to paragraph 91 of the same article. When the relevant article is analyzed, it is concluded that crime scene investigation procedures in places other than public places, i.e. places closed to the public, shall be carried out upon the written order of the judge or the public prosecutor in cases of inconvenience in delay. At the legal level, the issue of who will give the order for crime scene investigation is regulated in additional Article 67 of the PVSK. Accordingly, the police shall, upon the order of the public prosecutor, carry out the necessary examinations and technical investigations at the crime scene in order to identify the evidence of the offence, identify the evidence, take it under custody and send it to the relevant places for examination. As can be seen, the aforementioned article of the law does not stipulate a special issue regarding the question of whether this authorization will be valid even if the crime scene constitutes an area closed to the public, contrary to the regulation. Likewise, there is no provision in the article regarding the fact that the crime scene is a place protected by the right to inviolability of residence. In this study, the issue of which authority will orderdecree the crime scene investigation in all these cases has been addressed with a new approach by considering Article 21 of the Constitution.

 Olay yeri incelemesi işlemine karar verme yetkisinin hangi merciye ait olduğu konusu Adlî ve Önleme Aramaları Yönetmeliğinin 92. fıkrasında aynı maddenin 91. fıkrasına atıf yapılmak suretiyle dolaylı şekilde, düzenlenmektedir. İlgili madde incelendiğinde herkesin girip çıkacağı yerler dışında kalan yerlerde, yani kamuya kapalı yerlerde, olay yeri inceleme işlemlerinin hâkim veya gecikmesinde sakınca bulunan hâllerde Cumhuriyet savcısının yazılı emri üzerine gerçekleştirileceği sonucuna varılmaktadır. Olay yeri inceleme emrini kimin vereceği hususu kanun düzeyinde ise PVSKda ek m. 67de düzenlidir. Buna göre polis, suçun delillerini tespit etmek amacıyla, Cumhuriyet savcısının emriyle olay yerinde gerekli inceleme ve teknik araştırmaları yapacak, delilleri tespit edecek, muhafaza altına alacak ve incelenmek üzere ilgili yerlere gönderecektir. Görüldüğü üzere bahsi geçen kanun maddesinde olay yerinin kamuya kapalı alan teşkil etmesi halinde dahi bu yetkinin mi geçerli olacağı sorusuna ilişkin olarak özel bir husus, yönetmeliğin aksine, öngörülmemiştir. Aynı şekilde olay yerinin konut dokunulmazlığı hakkıyla korunan bir yer olması haline ilişkin de maddede herhangi bir husus yer almamaktadır. Çalışmada tüm bu hallerde olay yeri incelemesinin hangi merciin emriylekararıyla yapılacağı hususu AY m. 21 de gözetilerek yeni bir yaklaşımla ele alınmıştır.

Makale detayları

THE AUTHORITY TO DECIDE ON THE CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATION PROCEDURE AND THE PROBLEM OF LIMITATION OF THE RIGHT TO RESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY

Yazarlar:

Çiler Damla Bayraktar

Yayıncı:

Selcuk University

Ana Başlıklar:

Ceza Hukuku

Dergi:

Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.33 Issue 1, pp.207-238

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

3/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001343909

pISSN:

1306-8075

• Crime scene investigation

• PVSK additional article

PVSK additional article 6/8 •

Regulation on Forensic and Preventive Searches Paragraph 9/2Olay yeri inceleme

PVSK ek m. 6/7

PVSK ek m. 6/8

adli ve önleme aramaları yönetmeliği m. 9/2

Sayı

Makale detayları

Yazarlar: Çiler Damla Bayraktar

Yayıncı: Selcuk University

Ana Başlıklar: Ceza Hukuku

Dergi: Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.33 Issue 1, pp.207-238

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 3/2025

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001343909

pISSN: 1306-8075

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Çiler Damla Bayraktar

Yayıncı:

Selcuk University

Ana Başlıklar:

Ceza Hukuku

Dergi:

Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi Vol.33 Issue 1, pp.207-238

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

3/2025

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001343909

pISSN:

1306-8075