THE DISCIPLINE OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AS A BOURGEOIS SCIENCE IN THE REPRODUCTION OF GRAMSHIAN HEGEMONY

Yasin Avcı; Rukiye Saygılı

Makale detayları

THE DISCIPLINE OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AS A BOURGEOIS SCIENCE IN THE REPRODUCTION OF GRAMSHIAN HEGEMONY

Yazarlar:

Yasin Avcı | Rukiye Saygılı

Yayıncı:

Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University

Ana Başlıklar:

Siyasal Teori ve Siyaset Felsefesi | Uluslararası İlişkiler Kuramları

Dergi:

Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal Ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi Vol.26 Issue 47, pp.1281-1303

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001334006

pISSN:

2147-7833

Anahtar kelimeler:

Özet:

 Antonio Gramsci is one of the important names discussed in the International Relations IR discipline due to his approach to hegemony. Indeed, Gramsci, who put forward a hegemony structure based on the consent component instead of the hegemony approach that is dominant in IR and based on the elements of coercion and material power, has had a strong influence on the discipline. So much so that IR studies on Gramsci are mainly clustered around Robert W. Coxs Critical Theory, which is put forward with a Neo-Gramscian perspective. Similarly, studies that comparatively examine the hegemony approaches of the theories of the discipline with Gramscian hegemony are also common. In this study, the IR discipline itself is examined within the scope of its functionality in terms of the continuationreproduction of Gramscian hegemony. In other words, the instrumentality of IR in terms of establishing the consent element of hegemony that Gramsci emphasizes and the issue of which aspects of hegemony this instrumentality of the discipline corresponds to are the fundamental problematic of the study. Therefore, the study aims to reveal how the discipline is functionalized in terms of establishing the consent element of Gramscian hegemony, through the signs that show that IR is a discipline of the dominant bourgeois class.

 Antonio Gramsci is one of the important names discussed in the International Relations IR discipline due to his approach to hegemony. Indeed, Gramsci, who put forward a hegemony structure based on the consent component instead of the hegemony approach that is dominant in IR and based on the elements of coercion and material power, has had a strong influence on the discipline. So much so that IR studies on Gramsci are mainly clustered around Robert W. Coxs Critical Theory, which is put forward with a Neo-Gramscian perspective. Similarly, studies that comparatively examine the hegemony approaches of the theories of the discipline with Gramscian hegemony are also common. In this study, the IR discipline itself is examined within the scope of its functionality in terms of the continuationreproduction of Gramscian hegemony. In other words, the instrumentality of IR in terms of establishing the consent element of hegemony that Gramsci emphasizes and the issue of which aspects of hegemony this instrumentality of the discipline corresponds to are the fundamental problematic of the study. Therefore, the study aims to reveal how the discipline is functionalized in terms of establishing the consent element of Gramscian hegemony, through the signs that show that IR is a discipline of the dominant bourgeois class.

 Antonio Gramsci is one of the important names discussed in the International Relations IR discipline due to his approach to hegemony. Indeed, Gramsci, who put forward a hegemony structure based on the consent component instead of the hegemony approach that is dominant in IR and based on the elements of coercion and material power, has had a strong influence on the discipline. So much so that IR studies on Gramsci are mainly clustered around Robert W. Coxs Critical Theory, which is put forward with a Neo-Gramscian perspective. Similarly, studies that comparatively examine the hegemony approaches of the theories of the discipline with Gramscian hegemony are also common. In this study, the IR discipline itself is examined within the scope of its functionality in terms of the continuationreproduction of Gramscian hegemony. In other words, the instrumentality of IR in terms of establishing the consent element of hegemony that Gramsci emphasizes and the issue of which aspects of hegemony this instrumentality of the discipline corresponds to are the fundamental problematic of the study. Therefore, the study aims to reveal how the discipline is functionalized in terms of establishing the consent element of Gramscian hegemony, through the signs that show that IR is a discipline of the dominant bourgeois class.

 Antonio Gramsci, hegemonya yaklaşımı sebebiyle Uluslararası İlişkiler Uİ disiplini nezdinde tartışılan önemli isimlerdendir. Nitekim Uİde hâkim olan ve zor ile maddi güç unsurlarına dayalı hegemonya yaklaşımı yerine rıza bileşenini de temel alan bir hegemonya kurgusu ortaya koyan Gramscinin disiplindeki etkisi güçlü olmuştur. Öyle ki Gramsciye dair Uİ çalışmaları, ağırlıklı olarak Neo-Gramşiyan bir perspektifle ortaya konan Robert W. Coxun Eleştirel Teorisi etrafında kümelenmiştir. Benzer şekilde Gramşiyan hegemonya ile disiplinin teorilerinin hegemonya yaklaşımlarını mukayeseli olarak inceleyen çalışmalar da yaygındır. Bu çalışmada ise bizatihi Uİ disiplini, Gramşiyan hegemonyanın devamıyeniden üretimi noktasındaki işlevselliği kapsamında incelenmiştir. Bir başka anlatımla Gramscinin üzerinde durduğu hegemonyanın rıza unsurunun tesisi bakımından Uİnin araçsallığı ile disiplinin bu araçsallığının hegemonyanın görünümlerinden hangilerine denk geldiği meselesi çalışmanın temel sorunsalıdır. Dolayısıyla çalışmada, Uİnin hâkim burjuva sınıfın bir disiplini olduğunu gösteren emareler üzerinden disiplinin Gramşiyan hegemonyanın rıza unsurunun tesisi bakımından nasıl işlevselleştirildiğinin ortaya konması olmuştur.

Makale detayları

THE DISCIPLINE OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AS A BOURGEOIS SCIENCE IN THE REPRODUCTION OF GRAMSHIAN HEGEMONY

Yazarlar:

Yasin Avcı | Rukiye Saygılı

Yayıncı:

Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University

Ana Başlıklar:

Siyasal Teori ve Siyaset Felsefesi | Uluslararası İlişkiler Kuramları

Dergi:

Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal Ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi Vol.26 Issue 47, pp.1281-1303

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001334006

pISSN:

2147-7833

Antonio Gramsci

Hegemony

International RelationsAntonio Gramsci

Hegemonya

Uluslararası İlişkiler

Sayı

Makale detayları

THE DISCIPLINE OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AS A BOURGEOIS SCIENCE IN THE REPRODUCTION OF GRAMSHIAN HEGEMONY

Yazarlar: Yasin Avcı | Rukiye Saygılı

Yayıncı: Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University

Ana Başlıklar: Siyasal Teori ve Siyaset Felsefesi | Uluslararası İlişkiler Kuramları

Dergi: Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal Ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi Vol.26 Issue 47, pp.1281-1303

Belge Tipi: Makale

Yayın Tarihi: 12/2024

Belge Dili: Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.): 2001334006

pISSN: 2147-7833

Antonio Gramsci

Hegemony

International RelationsAntonio Gramsci

Hegemonya

Uluslararası İlişkiler

Sayı

Yazarlar:

Yasin Avcı | Rukiye Saygılı

Yayıncı:

Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University

Ana Başlıklar:

Siyasal Teori ve Siyaset Felsefesi | Uluslararası İlişkiler Kuramları

Dergi:

Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal Ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi Vol.26 Issue 47, pp.1281-1303

Belge Tipi:

Makale

Yayın Tarihi:

12/2024

Belge Dili:

Türkçe

Document ID (Org No.):

2001334006

pISSN:

2147-7833